Online supplementation for teaching evidence-based medicine: feasibility of a randomised-controlled trial
- PMID: 32719050
- PMCID: PMC8479740
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111372
Online supplementation for teaching evidence-based medicine: feasibility of a randomised-controlled trial
Abstract
Background and objectives: As teaching technology advances, medical education is increasingly using digital mediums and exploring instructional models such as the flipped classroom and blended learning courses, where the in-class taught sessions are more groups on content delivered before class. Early evidence suggests lectures and foundational material can be equally provided online, but we have low-quality research to be convinced. We aim to test and develop an online evidence-based teaching resource that seeks to improve the availability and scalability of evidence-based medicine (EBM) learning tools. We evaluate the feasibility of a study design that could test for changes in academic performance in EBM skills using an online supplement.
Methods: Mixed-methods feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in an undergraduate medical student cohort.
Results: Of a small cohort (n=34), eight participants agreed to randomisation and completed the study. No study participant completed the EBM supplementary course in full. Students report time-management as a significant barrier in participation, and all aspects of the study and communications should be delivered with efficiency a key consideration.
Conclusion: Randomising students to an online EBM supplement within a medical school programme presents challenges of recruitment and student motivation, but the study design is potentially feasible.
Keywords: evidence-based practice; medical education & training.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The online course intervention design and its implementation were a joint initiative of MCMcC and CH. DMcC and DY work within the medical sciences division to administer teaching in the medical school programme. DN and MCMcC have presented this course as part of a sample curriculum in teaching evidence-based medicine. CH, TRF and DN are paid faculty who teach on the evidence-based health care (EBHC) programme, Oxford University. MCMcC is also part-time lecturer on the EBHC programme.
Figures
References
-
- Shaneyfelt T, Karyn Baum MD, Mse DB, et al. Instruments for Evaluating Education in Evidence-Based Practice A Systematic Review [Internet]. Available: https://jamanetwork.com/ - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials