Commentary: RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review

Kurt C Stange^{1

2

3}

Affiliations

¹ Center for Community Health Integration, Research and Development for Community Health and Integrated, Personalized Care, Cleveland, OH, United States.
² Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good Scholar, The Institute for Integrative Health, Cleveland, OH, United States.
³ Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Oncology and Sociology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.

Comment

Kurt C Stange. Front Public Health. 2020.

. 2020 Jul 3:8:245.

doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00245. eCollection 2020.

Kurt C Stange^{1

2

3}

¹ Center for Community Health Integration, Research and Development for Community Health and Integrated, Personalized Care, Cleveland, OH, United States.
² Center for the Advancement of Primary Health Care for the Public Good Scholar, The Institute for Integrative Health, Cleveland, OH, United States.
³ Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Oncology and Sociology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.

No abstract available

Keywords: RE-AIM framework; evaluation; evidence-based; interventions; program planning.

Comment on

RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review.
Glasgow RE, Harden SM, Gaglio B, Rabin B, Smith ML, Porter GC, Ory MG, Estabrooks PA. Glasgow RE, et al. Front Public Health. 2019 Mar 29;7:64. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064. eCollection 2019. Front Public Health. 2019. PMID: 30984733 Free PMC article. Review.

1. Glasgow RE, Harden SM, Gaglio B, Rabin B, Rabin ML, Porter GC, et al. . RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. Front Public Health. (2019) 7:64. 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Feldstein AC, Glasgow RE. A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. J Comm J Qual Patient Saf. (2008) 34:228–43. 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34030-6 - DOI - PubMed
1. McCreight MS, Rabin BA, Glasgow RE, Ayele RA, Leonard CA, Gilmartin HM, et al. . Using the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) to qualitatively assess multilevel contextual factors to help plan, implement, evaluate, and disseminate health services programs. Transl Behav Med. (2019) 9:1002–11. 10.1093/tbm/ibz085 - DOI - PubMed
1. Chambers DA, Glasgow RE, Stange KC. The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implement Sci. (2013) 8:117. 10.1186/1748-5908-8-117 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Haynes A, Garvey K, Davidson S, Milat A. What can policy-makers get out of systems thinking? Policy partners' experiences of a systems-focused research collaboration in preventive health. Int J Health Policy Manage. (2020) 9:65–76. 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.86 - DOI - PMC - PubMed