Hybrid PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and lung nodules-a literature review
- PMID: 32719914
- DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04955-z
Hybrid PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and lung nodules-a literature review
Abstract
Background: The use of hybrid PET/MRI for clinical staging is growing in several cancer forms and, consequently, PET/MRI has also gained interest in the assessment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and lung lesions. However, lung evaluation with PET/MRI is associated with challenges related to technical issues and diagnostic image quality. We, therefore, investigated the published literature on PET/MRI for clinical staging in NSCLC or lung nodule detection specifically addressing diagnostic accuracy and technical issues.
Methods: The data originates from a systematic search performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library on hybrid PET/MRI in patients with cancer for a scoping review published earlier ( https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04402-8 ). Studies in English and German evaluating the diagnostic performance of hybrid PET/MRI for NSCLC or lung nodule detection in cancer patients were selected. Data reported in peer-reviewed journals without restrictions to year of publication were included.
Results: A total of 3138 publications were identified from which 116 published 2012-2018 were included. Of these, nine studies addressed PET/MRI in NSCLC (4) or lung nodule detection (5). Overall, PET/MRI did not provide advantages in preoperative T- and N-staging in NSCLC compared to PET/CT. The data on M-staging were too few for conclusions to be drawn. The lung nodule detection rate of PET/MRI was comparable to that of PET/CT for FDG-avid nodules larger than 10 mm, but the sensitivity of PET/MRI for detection of non-FDG-avid nodules smaller than 5 mm was low.
Conclusion: PET/MRI did not provide advantages in T- and N-staging of NSCLC compared to PET/CT. PET/MRI had a comparable sensitivity for detection of FDG-avid lung nodules and nodules over 10 mm, but PET/CT yielded a higher detection rate in non FDG-avid lung nodules under 5 mm. With PET/MRI, the overall detection rate for lung nodules in various cancer types remains inferior to that of PET/CT due to the lower diagnostic performance of MRI than CT in the lungs.
Keywords: 18F-FDG; Lung lesions; NSCLC; PET/CT; PET/MRI.
Similar articles
-
18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI diagnostic performance in M staging for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2020 Jul;30(7):3641-3649. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06703-1. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32125513
-
Preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: comparison of whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography.Eur Radiol. 2012 Dec;22(12):2859-67. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2542-y. Epub 2012 Jul 9. Eur Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22772365
-
Thoracic staging with 18F-FDG PET/MR in non-small cell lung cancer - does it change therapeutic decisions in comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT?Eur Radiol. 2017 Feb;27(2):681-688. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4397-0. Epub 2016 May 14. Eur Radiol. 2017. PMID: 27180186
-
Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for N-Staging in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. A Systematic Review.Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed). 2019 Jan;55(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 May 24. Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed). 2019. PMID: 29803524
-
The lung cancers: staging and response, CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, DWI: review and new perspectives.Br J Radiol. 2023 Aug;96(1148):20220339. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220339. Epub 2023 May 17. Br J Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37097296 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
[18F]FDG PET/CT versus [18F]FDG PET/MRI in staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a head-to-head comparative meta-analysis.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 13;11:1517805. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1517805. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 39871837 Free PMC article.
-
Auxiliary Diagnosis of Lung Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data under Deep Learning.Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 May 4;2022:1994082. doi: 10.1155/2022/1994082. eCollection 2022. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022. PMID: 35572829 Free PMC article.
-
Recent advances in PET/MR imaging for head and neck tumors: a systematic review of the last three years.Radiol Med. 2025 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s11547-025-02075-y. Online ahead of print. Radiol Med. 2025. PMID: 40875092 Review.
-
Diagnostic performance of whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MR in cancer M staging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2024 Jan;34(1):673-685. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10009-3. Epub 2023 Aug 3. Eur Radiol. 2024. PMID: 37535156
-
PET/MRI Improves Management of Children with Cancer.J Nucl Med. 2021 Oct;62(10):1334-1340. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.259747. J Nucl Med. 2021. PMID: 34599010 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A, et al. GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;2018. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492 .
-
- Gavra M, Syed R, Fraioli F, Afaq A, Bomanji J. PET/MRI in the upper abdomen. Semin Nucl Med. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2015.03.00 .
-
- Catalano OA, Coutinho AM, Sahani DV, Vangel MG, Gee MS, Hahn PF, et al. Colorectal cancer staging: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MR. Abdom Radiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2015.03.002 .
-
- Lee DH, Lee JM. Whole-body PET/MRI for colorectal cancer staging: is it the way forward? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25337 .
-
- de Barbosa F G, Queiroz MA, Nunes RF, Marin JFG, Buchpiguel CA, Cerri GG. Clinical perspectives of PSMA PET/MRI for prostate cancer. Clinics. 2018. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2018/e586s
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical