Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul 25;12(8):2054.
doi: 10.3390/cancers12082054.

PARP Inhibitor Resistance Mechanisms and Implications for Post-Progression Combination Therapies

Affiliations
Review

PARP Inhibitor Resistance Mechanisms and Implications for Post-Progression Combination Therapies

Elizabeth K Lee et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

The use of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) is growing widely as FDA approvals have shifted its use from the recurrence setting to the frontline setting. In parallel, the population developing PARPi resistance is increasing. Here we review the role of PARP, DNA damage repair, and synthetic lethality. We discuss mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibition and how this informs on novel combinations to re-sensitize cancer cells to PARPi.

Keywords: BRCA; DNA damage repair; PARP inhibitor; PARP inhibitor resistance; homologous recombination; ovarian cancer; replication fork.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

E.K.L. declares no conflict of interest. U.A.M. reports consulting fees for Merck.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Thematic mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Rationale for re-sensitization to PARPi. Almost all HGSOC harbor mutant p53, with cell cycle dysregulation at baseline. Inhibition of ATM or ATR further prevents the appropriate halting of the cell cycle. Using agents that reestablish HR deficiency allows for the accumulation of endogenous and exogenous DNA damage, trapped PARP, and replication stress, ultimately leading to mitotic catastrophe and cell death.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jachimowicz R.D., Goergens J., Reinhardt H.C. DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice - from basic biology to clinical exploitation. Cell Cycle. 2019;18:1423–1434. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2019.1618542. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen C.-C., Feng W., Lim P.X., Kass E.M., Jasin M. Homology-Directed Repair and the Role of BRCA1, BRCA2, and Related Proteins in Genome Integrity and Cancer. Annu. Rev. Cancer Biol. 2018;2:313–349. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-030617-050502. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Noordermeer S.M., Adam S., Setiaputra D., Barazas M., Pettitt S.J., Ling A.K., Olivieri M., Álvarez-Quilón A., Moatti N., Zimmermann M., et al. The shieldin complex mediates 53BP1-dependent DNA repair. Nature. 2018;560:117–121. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0340-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ghezraoui H., Oliveira C., Becker J.R., Bilham K., Moralli D., Anzilotti C., Fischer R., Deobagkar-Lele M., Sanchiz-Calvo M., Fueyo-Marcos E., et al. 53BP1 cooperation with the REV7–shieldin complex underpins DNA structure-specific NHEJ. Nature. 2018;560:122–127. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0362-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Findlay S., Heath J., Luo V.M., Malina A., Morin T., Coulombe Y., Djerir B., Li Z., Samiei A., Simo-Cheyou E., et al. SHLD 2/FAM 35A co-operates with REV 7 to coordinate DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. EMBO J. 2018;37 doi: 10.15252/embj.2018100158. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources