Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul 25;9(8):445.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9080445.

Current Antimycotics, New Prospects, and Future Approaches to Antifungal Therapy

Affiliations
Review

Current Antimycotics, New Prospects, and Future Approaches to Antifungal Therapy

Gina Wall et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

Fungal infections represent an increasing threat to a growing number of immune- and medically compromised patients. Fungi are eukaryotic organisms and, as such, there is a limited number of selective targets that can be exploited for antifungal drug development. This has also resulted in a very restricted number of antifungal drugs that are clinically available for the treatment of invasive fungal infections at the present time-polyenes, azoles, echinocandins, and flucytosine. Moreover, the utility of available antifungals is limited by toxicity, drug interactions and the emergence of resistance, which contribute to high morbidity and mortality rates. This review will present a brief summary on the landscape of current antifungals and those at different stages of clinical development. We will also briefly touch upon potential new targets and opportunities for novel antifungal strategies to combat the threat of fungal infections.

Keywords: antifungal agents; antifungal drug development; fungal infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simplified schematic diagram depicting the current antifungals and their modes of action.

References

    1. O’Brien H.E., Parrent J.L., Jackson J.A., Moncalvo J.M., Vilgalys R. Fungal community analysis by large-scale sequencing of environmental samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;71:5544–5550. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5544-5550.2005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kohler J.R., Hube B., Puccia R., Casadevall A., Perfect J.R. Fungi that Infect Humans. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017;5 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0014-2016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perfect J.R. The antifungal pipeline: A reality check. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017;16:603–616. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.46. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown G.D., Denning D.W., Gow N.A., Levitz S.M., Netea M.G., White T.C. Hidden killers: Human fungal infections. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012;4:165rv113. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004404. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fisher M.C., Henk D.A., Briggs C.J., Brownstein J.S., Madoff L.C., McCraw S.L., Gurr S.J. Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature. 2012;484:186–194. doi: 10.1038/nature10947. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources