Endovascular treatment of complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms using TuBridge flow diverters
- PMID: 32722987
- PMCID: PMC7645195
- DOI: 10.1177/1591019920946216
Endovascular treatment of complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms using TuBridge flow diverters
Abstract
Background: The safety and efficacy of the TuBridge flow diverter in treating middle cerebral artery aneurysms remains unknown. In this study, we report our preliminary experience treating complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms using the TuBridge flow diverter.
Methods: A prospectively maintained database of intracranial aneurysms treated with the TuBridge flow diverter was retrospectively reviewed, and patients with middle cerebral artery aneurysms were included in this study. Demographics, aneurysm features, complications, and clinical and angiographic outcomes were assessed. Evaluation of the angiographic results included occlusion grade of aneurysm (O'Kelly-Marotta grading scale), patency of jailed branch(es), and in-stent stenosis.
Results: Eight patients with eight middle cerebral artery aneurysms were included in this study. The mean aneurysm size was 11.8 ± 6.8 mm. There were no procedure-related complications and there was no morbidity or mortality at a mean follow-up of 11.3 ± 3.6 months. All patients had follow-up angiograms at a mean of 7.5 ± 4.0 months after surgery. Of the eight patients, there was 1 (12.5%) O'Kelly-Marotta grading scale A, 3 (37.5%) O'Kelly-Marotta grading scale B, 1 (12.5%) O'Kelly-Marotta grading scale C, and 3 (37.5%) O'Kelly-Marotta grading scale D. Of the seven patients with jailed branch, the blood flow of jailed branch was unchanged in 4 (57.1%), decreased in 2 (28.6%), and occluded in 1 (14.3%). In-stent stenosis was mild in 2 (25%) patients and moderate in 1 (12.5%) patient.
Conclusion: Midterm results suggest that endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms using the TuBridge flow diverter is safe and associated with good outcomes. The TuBridge flow diverter may be an option for complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms that are difficult to treat with either clipping or coiling.
Keywords: TuBridge flow diverter; endovascular treatment; middle cerebral artery aneurysm.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures




References
-
- Alreshidi M, Cote DJ, Dasenbrock HH, et al. Coiling versus microsurgical clipping in the treatment of unruptured Middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2018; 83: 879–889. - PubMed
-
- Rodriguez-Hernandez A, Sughrue ME, Akhavan S, et al. Current management of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: surgical results with a “clip first” policy. Neurosurgery 2013; 72: 415–427. - PubMed
-
- Smith TR, Cote DJ, Dasenbrock HH, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of endovascular coiling versus microsurgical clipping for unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2015; 84: 942–953. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources