Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct;34(5):101548.
doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2020.101548. Epub 2020 Jul 25.

Implementing models of care for musculoskeletal conditions in health systems to support value-based care

Affiliations
Review

Implementing models of care for musculoskeletal conditions in health systems to support value-based care

Robyn Speerin et al. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Models of Care (MoCs), and their local Models of Service Delivery, for people with musculoskeletal conditions are becoming an acceptable way of supporting effective implementation of value-based care. MoCs can support the quadruple aim of value-based care through providing people with musculoskeletal disease improved access to health services, better health outcomes and satisfactory experience of their healthcare; ensure the health professionals involved are experiencing satisfaction in delivering such care and health system resources are better utilised. Implementation of MoCs is relevant at the levels of clinical practice (micro), service delivery organisations (meso) and health system (macro) levels. The development, implementation and evaluation of MoCs has evolved over the last decade to more purposively engage people with lived experience of their condition, to operationalise the Chronic Care Model and to employ innovative solutions. This paper explores how MoCs have evolved and are supporting the delivery of value-based care in health systems.

Keywords: Evaluation; Health system strengthening; Implementation; Models of care; Musculoskeletal; Patient-centred; Value-based care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Working towards value-based care across a health system. Developed by Speerin R, Chua J and Briggs AM.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary framework for assessing readiness of an MoC for implementation (domains 1–4), initiating implementation (domain 5) and measuring success of a musculoskeletal MoC (domains 6–9). Reprinted from ‘Arthritis Care and Research, 69(4), Briggs AM, Jordan JE, Jennings M, Speerin R, Bragge P, Chua J, Woolf AD, Slater H: Supporting the evaluation and implementation of musculoskeletal Models of Care: A globally informed framework for judging readiness and success, 567–77, Copyright (2017)’, with permission from John Wiley and Sons, license number 4760990333394 [18]).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Evaluation hierarchy for Models of Care. Reprinted from ‘Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol, 30(5), Briggs AM, Chan M, Slater H: Models of Care for musculoskeletal health: Moving towards meaningful implementation and evaluation across conditions and care settings, 359–74, Copyright (2016)’, with permission from Elsevier, license number 4760981373908 [14]).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Challenges to implementation of contemporary MSK models of care in health systems. Reprinted with permission by the owner, Briggs AM.

References

    1. James S.L., Abate D., Abate K.H., et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789–1858. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schofield D.J., Shrestha R.N., Cunich M., et al. Lost productive life years caused by chronic conditions in Australians aged 45-64 years, 2010-2030. Med J Aust. 2015;203:260. - PubMed
    1. Babatunde O.O., Jordan J.L., Van der Windt D.A., et al. Effective treatment options for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic overview of current evidence. PloS One. 2017;12 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin I., Wiles L., Waller R., et al. What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines: systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54:79–86. - PubMed
    1. McGlynn E.A., Asch S.M., Adams J., et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–2645. - PubMed