Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;7(1):e000651.
doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000651.

Management of tracheostomies in the intensive care unit: a scoping review

Affiliations

Management of tracheostomies in the intensive care unit: a scoping review

Kirsty A Whitmore et al. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: While there is an extensive body of literature surrounding the decision to insert, and methods for inserting, a tracheostomy, the optimal management of tracheostomies within the intensive care unit (ICU) from after insertion until ICU discharge is not well understood. The objective was to identify and map the key concepts relating to, and identify research priorities for, postinsertion management of adult patients with tracheostomies in the ICU.

Design: Scoping review of the literature.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched from inception to 3 October 2019. Additional sources were searched for published and unpublished literature.

Eligibility criteria: We included studies of any methodology that addressed the a priori key questions relating to tracheostomy management in the ICU. No restrictions were placed on language or year of publication.

Data extraction and synthesis: Titles and abstracts were screened by two reviewers. Studies that met inclusion criteria were reviewed in full by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by a third. Data were extracted for included studies, and results mapped along the prespecified research questions.

Results: 6132 articles were screened, and 102 articles were included for detailed analysis. Protocolised weaning was found to be successful in liberating patients from the ventilator in several cohort studies. Observational studies showed that strategies that use T-pieces and high-flow oxygen delivery improve weaning success. Several lines of evidence, including one clinical trial, support early cuff deflation as a safe and effective strategy as it results in a reduced time to wean, shorter ICU stays and fewer complications. Early tracheostomy downsizing and/or switching to cuffless tubes was found to be of benefit in one study. A substantial body of evidence supports the use of speaking valves to facilitate communication. While this does not influence time to wean or incidence of complications, it is associated with a major benefit in patient satisfaction and experience. Use of care bundles and multidisciplinary team approaches have been associated with reduced complications and improved outcomes in several observational studies.

Conclusions: The limited body of evidence supports use of weaning protocols, early cuff deflation, use of speaking valves and multidisciplinary approaches. Clinical trials examining post-tracheostomy management strategies in ICUs are a priority.

Keywords: not applicable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram for study identification and inclusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Annual publications investigating postinsertion tracheostomy management strategies for patients admitted to intensive care units.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mapping of included articles based on key research question addressed.

References

    1. Abe T, Madotto F, Pham T, et al. . Epidemiology and patterns of tracheostomy practice in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICUs across 50 countries. Crit Care 2018;22:195 10.1186/s13054-018-2126-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klotz R, Probst P, Deininger M, et al. . Percutaneous versus surgical strategy for tracheostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and postoperative complications. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2018;403:137–49. - PubMed
    1. Freeman BD. Tracheostomy update: when and how. Crit Care Clin 2017;33:311–22. 10.1016/j.ccc.2016.12.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herritt B, Chaudhuri D, Thavorn K, et al. . Early vs. late tracheostomy in intensive care settings: impact on ICU and hospital costs. J Crit Care 2018;44:285–8. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.11.037 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perkins MP, King C, Moores LK. Early versus late tracheostomy: a metaanalysis. Chest 2009;136:16S 10.1378/chest.136.4_MeetingAbstracts.16S-h - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources