Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Oct;7(5):2146-2174.
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12782. Epub 2020 Jul 29.

Diabetes mellitus and risk of new-onset and recurrent heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Diabetes mellitus and risk of new-onset and recurrent heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Satoru Kodama et al. ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Despite mounting evidence of the positive relationship between diabetes mellitus (DM) and heart failure (HF), the entire context of the magnitude of risk for HF in relation to DM remains insufficiently understood. The principal reason is because new-onset HF (HF occurring in participants without a history of HF) and recurrent HF (HF re-occurring in patients with a history of HF) are not discriminated. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively and separately assess the risk of new-onset and recurrent HF depending on the presence or absence of DM. We systematically searched cohort studies that examined the relationship between DM and new-onset or recurrent HF using EMBASE and MEDLINE (from 1 Jan 1950 to 28 Jul 2019). The risk ratio (RR) for HF in individuals with DM compared with those without DM was pooled with a random-effects model. Seventy-four and 38 eligible studies presented data on RRs for new-onset and recurrent HF, respectively. For new-onset HF, the pooled RR [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 69 studies that examined HF as a whole [i.e. combining HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)] was 2.14 (1.96-2.34). The large between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 99.7%, P < 0.001) was significantly explained by mean age [pooled RR (95% CI) 2.60 (2.38-2.84) for mean age < 60 years vs. pooled RR (95% CI) 1.95 (1.79-2.13) for mean age ≥ 60 years] (P < 0.001). Pooled RRs (95% CI) of seven and eight studies, respectively, that separately examined HFpEF and HFrEF risk were 2.22 (2.02-2.43) for HFpEF and 2.73 (2.71-2.75) for HFrEF. The risk magnitudes between HFpEF and HFrEF were not significantly different in studies that examined both HFpEF and HFrEF risks (P = 0.86). For recurrent HF, pooled RR (95% CI) of the 38 studies was 1.39 (1.33-1.45). The large between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 80.1%, P < 0.001) was significantly explained by the proportion of men [pooled RR (95% CI) 1.53 (1.40-1.68) for < 65% men vs. 1.32 (1.25-1.39) for ≥65% men (P = 0.01)] or the large pooled RR for studies of only participants with HFpEF [pooled RR (95% CI), 1.73 (1.32-2.26) (P = 0.002)]. Results indicate that DM is a significant risk factor for both new-onset and recurrent HF. It is suggested that the risk magnitude is large for new-onset HF especially in young populations and for recurrent HF especially in women or individuals with HFpEF. DM is associated with future HFpEF and HFrEF to the same extent.

Keywords: Cohort study; Diabetes mellitus; Meta-analysis; New-onset heart failure; Recurrent heart failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Forest plot of the risk ratios (RRs) for new‐onset heart failure (HF) in participants with diabetes mellitus compared with those without diabetes mellitus. The RRs in each study are indicated by squares. The area of squares is proportional to the study weight (i.e. inverse of square of standard error of the RR). The pooled RR is indicated by a diamond.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Forest plot of the risk ratio (RR) for new‐onset heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in participants with diabetes mellitus compared with those without diabetes mellitus. (B) The forest plot after excluding one study (Agarwal et al.) with an extremely large study weight (i.e. inverse of square of standard error of the RR). The RR in each study is indicated by a square. The area of squares is proportional to the study weight. The pooled RR is indicated by a diamond. Abbreviations: CHS, Cardiovascular Health Survey; FHS, Framingham Health Study; Prevention of Renal and Vascular End‐Stage Disease.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of the risk ratios (RRs) for recurrent heart failure (HF) in HF patients with diabetes mellitus compared with those without diabetes mellitus. The RR in each study is indicated by a square. The area of squares is proportional to the study weight (i.e. inverse of square of standard error of the RR). The pooled RR is indicated by a diamond. Abbreviations: pEF, preserved ejection fraction; rEF, reduced ejection fraction.

References

    1. Roger VL. Epidemiology of heart failure. Circ Res 2013; 113: 646–659. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang H, Negishi K, Otahal P, Marwick TH. Clinical prediction of incident heart failure risk: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Open Heart 2015; 2: e000222. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolinsky FD, Smith DM, Stump TE, Overhage JM, Lubitz RM. The sequelae of hospitalization for congestive heart failure among older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 558–563. - PubMed
    1. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzen S, Sattar N, Eliasson B, Svensson AM, Zethelius B, Miftaraj M, McGuire DK, Rosengren A, Gudbjornsdottir S. Risk factors, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 633–644. - PubMed
    1. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, de Zeeuw D, Fulcher G, Erondu N, Shaw W, Law G, Desai M, Matthews DR, Group CPC . Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 644–657. - PubMed

Publication types