Short- and long-term outcomes for transvaginal specimen extraction versus minilaparotomy after robotic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: a mono-institution retrospective study
- PMID: 32727478
- PMCID: PMC7392672
- DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01967-9
Short- and long-term outcomes for transvaginal specimen extraction versus minilaparotomy after robotic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: a mono-institution retrospective study
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer resection surgery with transvaginal specimen extraction is becoming increasingly accepted and used by surgeons. However, few publications on robotic anterior sigmoid colon and rectal cancer resection with transvaginal specimen extraction (TVSE) have been reported, and a clinical outcome comparison between conventional robotic minilaparotomy (LAP) and transvaginal specimen extraction in anterior sigmoid colon and rectal cancer resection has not been performed. The current study compared the short- and long-term outcomes of TVSE and LAP for sigmoid colon cancer and rectal cancer in a mono-institution.
Methods: From December 2014 to October 2018, 45 patients who underwent TVSE and 45 patients who underwent LAP matched by tumor location, tumor stage, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, gender, and age at the same period were included in the current study. The short- and long-term outcomes of TVSE and LAP were discussed.
Results: No significant differences were found in patient characteristics. For the short-term outcomes, the operative time in the TVSE group was longer than that in the LAP group, and the postoperative pain and additional analgesia were lower in the TVSE group. Patients in the TVSE group required slightly less time to pass first flatus. There were no significant differences in overall complications, time to regular diet, length of hospital stay after surgery, estimated blood loss, or pathological outcomes. For long-term outcomes, the 3-year overall survival (94.9% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.702) and 3-year disease-free survival (88.4% vs. 86.2%, p = 0.758) were comparable between the two groups.
Conclusion: The robotic TVSE is safe and feasible in selected sigmoid/upper rectal cancer patients with tumor diameter < 5 cm. This approach has slightly better short-term outcomes in terms of less postoperative pain and less analgesic requirements without any significant difference in long-term outcomes.
Keywords: Natural orifice specimen extraction; Rectal cancer; Robotic surgery; Sigmoid colon cancer; Transvaginal specimen extraction.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in this manuscript.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Transvaginal specimen extraction versus conventional minilaparotomy after laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: mid-term results of a case-matched study.Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2342-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3466-1. Epub 2014 Feb 25. Surg Endosc. 2014. PMID: 24566749
-
[Short-term clinical efficacy of robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 25;22(12):1124-1130. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.12.006. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 31874527 Chinese.
-
[Comparison of short-term outcomes of transrectal specimen extraction during laparoscopic sigmoid radical resection versus conventional laparoscopically assisted procedure].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 25;20(6):665-670. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017. PMID: 28643312 Chinese.
-
Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction in minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jun 3;409(1):172. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03361-5. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024. PMID: 38829526 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Dec;33(12):1741-1753. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3145-0. Epub 2018 Sep 5. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018. PMID: 30187156
Cited by
-
Transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) in 3D laparoscopic partial or radical nephrectomy: a preliminary study.BMC Urol. 2021 Sep 8;21(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00890-9. BMC Urol. 2021. PMID: 34496814 Free PMC article.
-
Development and prospects of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer: a review article.Int J Surg. 2025 Apr 1;111(4):2973-2989. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002285. Int J Surg. 2025. PMID: 39903566 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Learning Curve of Robotic-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 11;12:931426. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.931426. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35898893 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis of robotic-assisted NOSE versus traditional TWSR in colorectal cancer surgery: postoperative outcomes and efficacy.BMC Surg. 2024 Aug 22;24(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02516-x. BMC Surg. 2024. PMID: 39174999 Free PMC article.
-
Progress, challenges, and future perspectives of robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer: a review.BMC Surg. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02538-5. BMC Surg. 2024. PMID: 39261821 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin [Internet]. 2016; Available from: 10.3322/caac.21338. - PubMed
-
- Dekker E, Tanis PJ, Vleugels JLA, Kasi PM, Wallace MB. Colorectal cancer. Lancet [Internet]. 2019; Available from: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32319-0. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials