Duct stenting versus modified Blalock-Taussig shunt in neonates and infants with duct-dependent pulmonary blood flow: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 32727685
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.008
Duct stenting versus modified Blalock-Taussig shunt in neonates and infants with duct-dependent pulmonary blood flow: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate whether duct stenting is associated with better survival and other clinical outcomes compared with the modified Blalock-Taussig shunt in infants with duct-dependent pulmonary flow.
Methods: A systematic search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed by 4 independent reviewers from inception to March 2019. Meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian and Laird method with inverse-variance weighting. The quality of evidence was summarized using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework.
Results: Six comparative observational studies were included, of which 3 were rated low risk of bias. There was no difference in 30-day mortality between the Blalock-Taussig shunt and duct stenting groups (risk ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-2.27; P = .96; I2 = 0%). However, there was benefit in favor of duct stenting for medium-term mortality (risk ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.99; P = .05; I2 = 0%). Duct stenting demonstrated a reduced risk for procedural complications compared with the Blalock-Taussig shunt (risk ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.81; P = .005; I2 = 0%). However, there was an increased risk for unplanned reintervention for duct stenting (risk ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-2.26; P < .00001; I2 = 10%). Duct stenting demonstrated shorter mean intensive care unit length of stay (mean difference, -4.69 days; 95% confidence interval, -7.30 to -2.07; P = .0004; I2 = 80%), as well as shorter hospital length of stay (mean difference, -5.78 days; 95% confidence interval, -9.27 to -2.28; P = .0009, I2 = 75%). The overall quality of evidence was rated low using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework.
Conclusions: Duct stenting demonstrated comparable early mortality, lower medium-term mortality, lower risk of procedural complications, and higher risk of reintervention compared with the Blalock-Taussig shunt.
Keywords: BTS; Blalock-Tassig shunt; duct stenting; duct-dependent PBF.
Crown Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Commentary: Duct stenting in neonates: Is it time to kiss goodbye our old friend, the Blalock-Taussig shunt?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;161(2):391-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.07.025. Epub 2020 Jul 14. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 32753104 No abstract available.
-
Commentary: Shunts versus stents? Collaboration better than competition.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;161(2):394-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.08.042. Epub 2020 Aug 20. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 32948304 No abstract available.
-
Commentary: Ductal stenting for ductal-dependent pulmonary blood flow: Time for an exclusive club to expand its membership?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;161(2):392-393. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.07.069. Epub 2020 Jul 24. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 33268124 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources