Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Sep;46(9):1707-1713.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06186-0. Epub 2020 Jul 29.

Comparative study of lung ultrasound and chest computed tomography scan in the assessment of severity of confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia

Affiliations
Observational Study

Comparative study of lung ultrasound and chest computed tomography scan in the assessment of severity of confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia

Laurent Zieleskiewicz et al. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: The relationship between lung ultrasound (LUS) and chest computed tomography (CT) scans in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia is not clearly defined. The primary objective of our study was to assess the performance of LUS in determining severity of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia compared with chest CT scan. Secondary objectives were to test the association between LUS score and location of the patient, use of mechanical ventilation, and the pulse oximetry (SpO2)/fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio.

Methods: A multicentre observational study was performed between 15 March and 20 April 2020. Patients in the Emergency Department (ED) or Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with acute dyspnoea who were PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2, and who had LUS and chest CT performed within a 24-h period, were included.

Results: One hundred patients were included. LUS score was significantly associated with pneumonia severity assessed by chest CT and clinical features. The AUC of the ROC curve of the relationship of LUS versus chest CT for the assessment of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia was 0.78 (CI 95% 0.68-0.87; p < 0.0001). A high LUS score was associated with the use of mechanical ventilation, and with a SpO2/FiO2 ratio below 357.

Conclusion: In known SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia patients, the LUS score was predictive of pneumonia severity as assessed by a chest CT scan and clinical features. Within the limitations inherent to our study design, LUS can be used to assess SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia severity.

Keywords: Chest computed tomography; Diagnostic accuracy; Lung ultrasound; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

LZ and TM received fees for teaching ultrasound to GE healthcare customers.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Diagnostic accuracy of LUS score for the detection of severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia assessed by chest CT scan. a ROC curve of LUS score versus chest CT scan. AUC = 0.78 (CI 95% 0.68–0.87; p < 0.0001), (b) Gray zone of LUS score versus chest CT scan. Solid line: Se (Sensitivity). Dotted line: Sp (Specificity)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Li Y, Xia L. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): role of chest CT in diagnosis and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;1:7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22954. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, et al. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a report of 1014 cases. Radiology. 2020;2:642. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200642. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu J, Wu X, Zeng W, et al. Chest CT findings in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and its relationship with clinical features. Invest Radiol. 2020;55:257–261. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000670. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mahdjoub E, Mohammad W, Lefevre T, et al. Admission chest CT score predicts 5-day outcome in patients with COVID-19. Intensive Care Med. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06118-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aliaga M, Forel J-M, De Bourmont S, et al. Diagnostic yield and safety of CT scans in ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:436–443. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3592-1. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types