Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Oct 29;136(18):2038-2050.
doi: 10.1182/blood.2020006844.

A randomized phase 3 trial of zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib in symptomatic Waldenström macroglobulinemia: the ASPEN study

Constantine S Tam  1   2   3   4 , Stephen Opat  5   6 , Shirley D'Sa  7 , Wojciech Jurczak  8 , Hui-Peng Lee  9 , Gavin Cull  10   11 , Roger G Owen  12 , Paula Marlton  13   14 , Björn E Wahlin  15 , Ramón Garcia Sanz  16 , Helen McCarthy  17 , Stephen Mulligan  18 , Alessandra Tedeschi  19 , Jorge J Castillo  20   21 , Jaroslaw Czyz  22   23 , Carlos Fernández de Larrea  24 , David Belada  25 , Edward Libby  26 , Jeffrey V Matous  27 , Marina Motta  28 , Tanya Siddiqi  29 , Monica Tani  30 , Marek Trneny  31 , Monique C Minnema  32 , Christian Buske  33 , Veronique Leblond  34 , Judith Trotman  35   36 , Wai Y Chan  37 , Jingjing Schneider  37 , Sunhee Ro  37 , Aileen Cohen  37 , Jane Huang  37 , Meletios Dimopoulos  38
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomized phase 3 trial of zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib in symptomatic Waldenström macroglobulinemia: the ASPEN study

Constantine S Tam et al. Blood. .

Abstract

Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition is an effective treatment approach for patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). The phase 3 ASPEN study compared the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib, a first-generation BTK inhibitor, with zanubrutinib, a novel highly selective BTK inhibitor, in patients with WM. Patients with MYD88L265P disease were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment with ibrutinib or zanubrutinib. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving a complete response (CR) or a very good partial response (VGPR) by independent review. Key secondary end points included major response rate (MRR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), disease burden, and safety. A total of 201 patients were randomized, and 199 received ≥1 dose of study treatment. No patient achieved a CR. Twenty-nine (28%) zanubrutinib patients and 19 (19%) ibrutinib patients achieved a VGPR, a nonstatistically significant difference (P = .09). MRRs were 77% and 78%, respectively. Median DOR and PFS were not reached; 84% and 85% of ibrutinib and zanubrutinib patients were progression free at 18 months. Atrial fibrillation, contusion, diarrhea, peripheral edema, hemorrhage, muscle spasms, and pneumonia, as well as adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, were less common among zanubrutinib recipients. Incidence of neutropenia was higher with zanubrutinib, although grade ≥3 infection rates were similar in both arms (1.2 and 1.1 events per 100 person-months). These results demonstrate that zanubrutinib and ibrutinib are highly effective in the treatment of WM, but zanubrutinib treatment was associated with a trend toward better response quality and less toxicity, particularly cardiovascular toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: C.S.T. receives research funding from Janssen and AbbVie and receives honoraria from Janssen, AbbVie, BeiGene, Novartis, and Roche. S.O. consults for AbbVie, Janssen, Gilead Sciences, Roche, Mundipharma, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Celgene; receives research funding from AbbVie, BeiGene, Janssen, Gilead Sciences, Roche, Celgene, and Epizyme; and receives honoraria from AbbVie, Janssen, Gilead Sciences, Roche, Mundipharma, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Celgene. S.D. participates in the speaker’s bureau for Amgen, receives research funding from Janssen and BeiGene, and has travel expenses paid by Janssen. W.J. consults for AstraZeneca, Debiopharm, Janssen, Gilead Sciences, and Roche and receives research funding from Acerta, AstraZeneca, Janssen, BeiGene, Bayer, Celltrion, Debiopharm, Epizyme, Merck, MorphoSys, MEI Pharma, Servier, Roche, and TG Therapeutics. H.-P.L. has equity ownership in CSL Behring, receives honoraria from Roche, and has travel expenses paid by AbbVie. G.C. receives research funding from BeiGene, Acerta, and Glycomimetics. R.G.O. receives honoraria from Janssen and Celgene and consults for, and has travel expenses paid by, Janssen. B.E.W. consults for Roche and receives research funding from Roche and Gilead Sciences. R.G.S. consults for Janssen; receives honoraria from Janssen, Takeda, and Amgen; receives research funding from Gilead Sciences and Incyte; and has travel expenses paid by Janssen and Takeda. H.M. receives honoraria from Janssen and consults for AstraZeneca. A.T. consults for and receives honoraria from Janssen SpA, AstraZeneca, and AbbVie. J.C. consults for BeiGene, Janssen, Kymera Therapeutics, and Pharmacyclics and receives research funding from AbbVie, BeiGene, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, and TG Therapeutics. C.F.d.L. consults for and receives honoraria from Janssen, Celgene, and Amgen and receives research funding from, and has travel expenses paid by, Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, and Takeda. D.B. consults for, receives research funding from, and has travel expenses paid by Roche, Takeda, and Gilead Sciences. E.L. consults for Akcea Therapeutics, Adaptive Phage Therapeutics, and Pharmacyclics. J.M. consults for Celgene and Pharmacyclics, receives honoraria from Celgene, and participates in the speaker’s bureau for Celgene. M.M. consults for Roche and Janssen. T.S. consults for AstraZeneca, Kite Pharma, Juno Therapeutics, and BeiGene; receives research funding from Pharmacyclics, Juno, BeiGene, Astra Zeneca, TG Therapeutics, and Celgene; and participates in the speaker’s bureau for Pharmacyclics, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Seattle Genetics. M. Trneny is an employee of Charles University General Hospital; receives honoraria from Janssen, Gilead Sciences, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, AbbVie, Roche, MorphoSys, and Incyte; and consults for Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, AbbVie, Amgen, Roche, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Celgene, and MorphoSys. M.C.M. consults for Kite/Gilead and Servier and has travel expenses paid by Celgene. C.B. receives honoraria from, consults for, and participates in the speaker’s bureau for Roche, Janssen, Celltrion, and BeiGene and receives research funding from Roche, Janssen, and BeiGene. V.L. receives honoraria from AstraZeneca, Roche, Gilead Sciences, Amgen, AbbVie, and Janssen; consults for AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Roche, and Janssen; participates in the speaker’s bureau for AbbVie and Janssen; and has travel expenses paid by AbbVie, Roche, and Janssen. J.T. receives research funding from BeiGene, Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Pharmacyclics, Roche, and Takeda. W.Y.C. is an employee of BeiGene and has equity ownership in BeiGene and Bristol Myers Squibb. J.S. is an employee of and has equity ownership in BeiGene. S.R. is an employee of BeiGene, has equity ownership in BeiGene and Amgen, and holds patents and receives royalties from Roche Molecular Diagnostics. A.C. is an employee of, has equity ownership in, and has travel expenses paid by BeiGene. J.H. is an employee of, has a leadership role at, and has equity ownership in BeiGene. M.D. consults for and receives honoraria from Amgen, Janssen, Takeda, Celgene, and Bristol Myers Squibb. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
BGB-3111-302 (ASPEN) patient disposition. CNS, central nervous system; inv, investigator; PD, progressive disease; pt, patient.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Forest plot of subgroup differences in the rate of CR/VGPR. *Unstratified rate difference and 95% CIs. ECOG-PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; IPSS, International Prognostic Scoring System.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier curves of survival and response. K-M curves for PFS (A), duration of major response (B), and duration of CR/VGPR (C). All K-M distributions are based on IRC-assessed responses for R/R and TN patients in each respective arm. HR, hazard ratio.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Time-to-event analyses for AEIs. Time-to-event analyses for atrial fibrillation/flutter (A), hemorrhage (including minor bleeding/bruising) (B), major hemorrhage (C), hypertension (D), neutropenia (E), pneumonia (F), all infections (G), and diarrhea (H).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Pal Singh S, Dammeijer F, Hendriks RW. Role of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in B cells and malignancies [published correction appears in Mol Cancer. 2019;18(10):79]. Mol Cancer. 2018;17(1):57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gertz MA. Waldenström macroglobulinemia: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2019;94(2):266-276. - PubMed
    1. Treon SP, Xu L, Yang G, et al. MYD88 L265P somatic mutation in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(9):826-833. - PubMed
    1. Cao Y, Hunter ZR, Liu X, et al. CXCR4 WHIM-like frameshift and nonsense mutations promote ibrutinib resistance but do not supplant MYD88(L265P) -directed survival signalling in Waldenström macroglobulinaemia cells. Br J Haematol. 2015;168(5):701-707. - PubMed
    1. Cao Y, Hunter ZR, Liu X, et al. The WHIM-like CXCR4(S338X) somatic mutation activates AKT and ERK, and promotes resistance to ibrutinib and other agents used in the treatment of Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. Leukemia. 2015;29(1):169-176. - PubMed

Publication types