Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 5;57(1):2002042.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.02042-2020. Print 2021 Jan.

Exhaled breath analysis by use of eNose technology: a novel diagnostic tool for interstitial lung disease

Affiliations
Free article

Exhaled breath analysis by use of eNose technology: a novel diagnostic tool for interstitial lung disease

Catharina C Moor et al. Eur Respir J. .
Free article

Abstract

Introduction: Early and accurate diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) remains a major challenge. Better noninvasive diagnostic tools are much needed. We aimed to assess the accuracy of exhaled breath analysis using eNose technology to discriminate between ILD patients and healthy controls, and to distinguish ILD subgroups.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, exhaled breath of consecutive ILD patients and healthy controls was analysed using eNose technology (SpiroNose). Statistical analyses were done using partial least square discriminant analysis and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Independent training and validation sets (2:1) were used in larger subgroups.

Results: A total of 322 ILD patients and 48 healthy controls were included: sarcoidosis (n=141), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (n=85), connective tissue disease-associated ILD (n=33), chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (n=25), idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (n=10), interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (n=11) and other ILDs (n=17). eNose sensors discriminated between ILD and healthy controls, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.00 in the training and validation sets. Comparison of patients with IPF and patients with other ILDs yielded an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.96) in the training set and an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.77-0.96) in the validation set. The eNose reliably distinguished between individual diseases, with AUC values ranging from 0.85 to 0.99.

Conclusions: eNose technology can completely distinguish ILD patients from healthy controls and can accurately discriminate between different ILD subgroups. Hence, exhaled breath analysis using eNose technology could be a novel biomarker in ILD, enabling timely diagnosis in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: C.C. Moor reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, during the conduct of the study; grants and other from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work; all fees and grants were paid to the Erasmus MC. Conflict of interest: J.C. Oppenheimer has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Nakshbandi has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.G.J.V. Aerts has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Brinkman has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A-H. Maitland-van der Zee reports grants from GSK, grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work; all personal fees were paid to the Amsterdam UMC. Conflict of interest: M.S. Wijsenbeek reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, during the conduct of the study; grants and other from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffman la Roche, other from Galapagos and Respivant, outside the submitted work; all fees and grants were paid to the Erasmus MC.

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources