Pocket-creation method improves efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a system review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 32732811
- DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001864
Pocket-creation method improves efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a system review and meta-analysis
Abstract
The pocket-creation method (PCM) is a new strategy for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The aim of this system review is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of PCM-ESD compared to conventional ESD (C-ESD) for colorectal neoplasm lesions. We performed literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL database from inception to 15 February 2020. Studies provided comparison between PCM-ESD and C-ESD for colorectal neoplasm lesions were included. En bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, occurrence rate of adverse events and operation speed/time were extracted from included studies. Pooled risk difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated in meta-analysis. Three cohort studies and one randomized control trial (RCT) were included, which contained 432 colorectal lesions removed by PCM-ESD and 959 lesions resected by C-ESD. PCM-ESD achieved significantly higher en bloc/R0 resection rate than C-ESD in cohort studies with pooled risk differences of 0.05 (CI, 0.03-0.07, I2 = 34%) and 0.14 (CI, 0.04-0.24, I2 = 83%). However, comparison of en bloc/R0 resection rate between two surgery strategies could not be estimated in RCT. Pooled results in cohort studies and data from RCT revealed comparable occurrence rate of adverse events between PCM-ESD and C-ESD. Measurements and outcomes of operation time/speed varied between the included studies and no consistent conclusion could be achieved in this aspect. The results indicate that PCM-ESD is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for colorectal neoplasm lesions and may be a superior treatment to C-ESD in en bloc/R0 resection rate.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Pocket-creation method versus conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Saudi Med J. 2025 May;46(5):450-458. doi: 10.15537/smj.2025.46.5.20250045. Saudi Med J. 2025. PMID: 40335108 Free PMC article.
-
The pocket-creation method facilitates colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video).Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 May;89(5):1045-1053. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.022. Epub 2019 Feb 1. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30716306
-
Pocket-creation method versus conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal neoplasms: a meta-analysis.Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 May;93(5):1038-1046.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Jan 21. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021. PMID: 33484729
-
Prospective randomized trial comparing the pocket-creation method and conventional method of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Aug;92(2):368-379. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.02.034. Epub 2020 Feb 29. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020. PMID: 32119937 Clinical Trial.
-
Tunneled or pocket creation method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jan;101(1):45-53.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.06.034. Epub 2024 Jul 2. Gastrointest Endosc. 2025. PMID: 38964480
Cited by
-
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Aug 7;37(5):277-288. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770941. eCollection 2024 Sep. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023. PMID: 39132198 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcomes of the Conventional versus Pocket-Creation Method for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Body Tumors Using a Dual Knife: A Retrospective Study.Gut Liver. 2023 Jul 15;17(4):547-557. doi: 10.5009/gnl220226. Epub 2022 Oct 21. Gut Liver. 2023. PMID: 36268583 Free PMC article.
-
Pocket-creation method versus conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Saudi Med J. 2025 May;46(5):450-458. doi: 10.15537/smj.2025.46.5.20250045. Saudi Med J. 2025. PMID: 40335108 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of pocket-creation method for early gastric cancers.Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1581-1592. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09620-0. Epub 2022 Sep 28. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 36171450
-
Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket creation method in the Japanese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Endosc Int Open. 2022 May 13;10(5):E694-E702. doi: 10.1055/a-1789-0548. eCollection 2022 May. Endosc Int Open. 2022. PMID: 35571471 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Fuccio L, Hassan C, Ponchon T, Mandolesi D, Farioli A, Cucchetti A, et al. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86:74–86.e17.
-
- Thorlacius H, Rönnow CF, Toth E. European experience of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review of clinical efficacy and safety. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:S10–S14.
-
- Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, et al. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc 2020; 32:219–239.
-
- Akintoye E, Kumar N, Aihara H, Nas H, Thompson CC. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4:E1030–E1044.
-
- Yamamoto K, Michida T, Nishida T, Hayashi S, Naito M, Ito T. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: recent technical advances for safe and successful procedures. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7:1114–1128.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous