Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr 6:7:100058.
doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2019.100058. eCollection 2019 Jun.

Patterns of antibiotic use in global pig production: A systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Patterns of antibiotic use in global pig production: A systematic review

Angkana Lekagul et al. Vet Anim Sci. .

Abstract

This review assesses the evidence for patterns of antibiotic use in pig on the basis of papers published in peer-reviewed journals in English between 2000 and 2017. Thirty-six articles were identified and reviewed, of which more than 85% of studies were conducted in Europe and North America. Penicillins and Tetracyclines groups were the most commonly used antibiotics in many countries. Oral medication in suckling and post-weaning periods were the most common applications of antibiotic administration in pig production. Antibiotic use is driven by age-specific diseases and the common pathogens causing these conditions where epidemiological profiles varied greatly across countries. In addition, the type and size of farm were associated with antibiotic use with finisher and larger farms using more antibiotics than farrow-to-finish and smaller farms. There is variation in the use of the highest priority critically important antimicrobials in humans across studies. However, this review indicates that they are still commonly used in pig production, for treatment and prevention of infection. This evidence calls for global efforts on the prudent use of antibiotics in response to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in the agricultural sector.

Keywords: Antibiotic; Antibiotic use; Antimicrobial resistance; Pig; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the screening process of the literature.

References

    1. Aarestrup F.M., Jensen V.F., Emborg H.D., Jacobsen E., Wegener H.C. Changes in the use of antimicrobials and the effects on productivity of swine farms in Denmark. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 2010;71(7):726–733. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.71.7.726. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aarestrup F.M. Veterinary drug usage and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria of animal origin. Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2005;96(4):271–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto960401.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aarestrup F.M., Oliver Duran C., Burch D.G.S. Antimicrobial resistance in swine production. Animal Health Research Reviews. 2008;9(02):135–148. doi: 10.1017/S1466252308001503. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alarcon P., Rushton J., Nathues H., Wieland B. Economic efficiency analysis of different strategies to control post-weaning multi-systemic wasting syndrome and porcine circovirus type 2 subclinical infection in 3-weekly batch system farms. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2013;110(110):103–118. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.12.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Apley M.D., Bush E.J., Morrison R.B., Singer R.S., Snelson H. Use estimates of in-feed antimicrobials in swine production in the United States. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. 2012;9(3):272–279. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2011.0983. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources