Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 17;1(6):354-365.
doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2019.07.014. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.

Remote Management for Peritoneal Dialysis: A Qualitative Study of Patient, Care Partner, and Clinician Perceptions and Priorities in the United States and the United Kingdom

Lalita Subramanian  1   2 , Rosalind Kirk  3 , Tony Cuttitta  1 , Nicole Bryant  4 , Kimberly Fox  1 , Margie McCall  4 , Erica Perry  4 , June Swartz  4 , Yanko Restovic  4 , Allison Jeter  4 , Angelito Bernardo  5 , Bruce Robinson  1 , Jeffrey Perl  1   6 , Ronald Pisoni  1 , Rachel L Perlman  1   2
Affiliations

Remote Management for Peritoneal Dialysis: A Qualitative Study of Patient, Care Partner, and Clinician Perceptions and Priorities in the United States and the United Kingdom

Lalita Subramanian et al. Kidney Med. .

Abstract

Rationale & objective: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a home-based kidney replacement therapy used by a growing number of patients with kidney failure. This qualitative study explores the impact of remote management technologies on PD treatment priorities of patients, their care partners, and clinicians.

Study design: Qualitative study, designed and conducted in collaboration with a stakeholder panel that included patients, patient advocates, care partners, and health care professionals.

Setting & participants: 13 health care providers, 13 patients, and 4 care partners with at least 3 months experience with PD were recruited from the United States and United Kingdom through postings in PD clinics, websites, and social media.

Methodology: Semi-structured telephone interviews with a purposive sample of participants.

Analytical approach: Inductive thematic development adapted from a grounded theory approach through analysis of interview transcripts by 3 independent coders.

Results: 4 main themes about PD treatments emerged that enabled evaluation of remote management: (1) impact of PD on everyday life, (2) simplifying treatment processes, (3) awareness and visibility of at-home treatments, and (4) support for managing treatments. The relative importance of these themes differed between patients/care partners and health care providers and by use of remote management cyclers.

Limitations: Remote management is new to PD, mirrored in the limited penetration of use in the study sample, suggestive of findings reflecting early adoption.

Conclusions: Participants welcomed technological advances such as remote management for PD, although priorities differed by stakeholder group. Remote management could potentially influence health care provider decisions about patient suitability for PD, while patients/care partners prioritized pre-emptive and early treatment adjustments. Currently, decisions about access to remote management are outside the control of patients and families, but this may change with more widespread use.

Keywords: Peritoneal dialysis; patient-centered reporting; qualitative; remote management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Interview participant screening and purposive sampling. A total of 65 potential participants responded to recruitment efforts; based on screening, eligibility, consent, and purposive sampling, 30 were interviewed. Abbreviations: HCPs, health care providers; non-RM, not remote management user; RM, remote management user.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Weinhandl E.D., Foley R.N., Gilbertson D.T., Arneson T.J., Snyder J.J., Collins A.J. Propensity-matched mortality comparison of incident hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(3):499–506. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar V.A., Sidell M.A., Jones J.P., Vonesh E.F. Survival of propensity matched incident peritoneal and hemodialysis patients in a United States health care system. Kidney Int. 2014;86(5):1016–1022. - PubMed
    1. Yeates K., Zhu N., Vonesh E., Trpeski L., Blake P., Fenton S. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are associated with similar outcomes for end-stage renal disease treatment in Canada. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(9):3568–3575. - PubMed
    1. US Renal Data System . National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; Bethesda, MD: 2017. USRDS 2017 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States.
    1. Dahlerus C., Quinn M., Messersmith E. Patient perspectives on the choice of dialysis modality: results from the Empowering Patients on Choices for Renal Replacement Therapy (EPOCH-RRT) Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68(6):901–910. - PubMed