Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;183(3):607-616.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05836-7. Epub 2020 Jul 30.

Identification of candidate mediators of chemoresponse in breast cancer through therapy-driven selection of somatic variants

Affiliations

Identification of candidate mediators of chemoresponse in breast cancer through therapy-driven selection of somatic variants

Waleed S Al Amri et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: More than a third of primary breast cancer patients are treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy, typically without guidance from predictive markers. Increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy provides opportunities for identification of molecules associated with treatment response, by comparing matched tumour samples before and after therapy. Our hypothesis was that somatic variants of increased prevalence after therapy promote resistance, while variants with reduced prevalence cause sensitivity.

Methods: We performed systematic analyses of matched pairs of cancer exomes from primary oestrogen receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers (n = 6) treated with neoadjuvant epirubicin/cyclophosphamide. We identified candidate genes as mediators of chemotherapy response by consistent subclonal changes in somatic variant prevalence through therapy, predicted variant impact on gene function, and enrichment of specific functional pathways. Influence of candidate genes on breast cancer outcome was tested using publicly available breast cancer expression data (n = 1903).

Results: We identified 14 genes as the strongest candidate mediators of chemoresponse: TCHH, MUC17, ARAP2, FLG2, ABL1, CENPF, COL6A3, DMBT1, ITGA7, PLXNA1, S100PBP, SYNE1, ZFHX4, and CACNA1C. Genes contained somatic variants showing prevalence changes in up to 4 patients, with up to 3 being predicted as damaging. Genes coding for extra-cellular matrix components or related signalling pathways were significantly over-represented among variants showing prevalence changes. Expression of 5 genes (TCHH, ABL1, CENPF, S100PBP, and ZFHX4) was significantly associated with patient survival.

Conclusions: Genomic analysis of paired pre- and post-therapy samples resulting from neoadjuvant therapy provides a powerful method for identification of mediators of response. Genes we identified should be assessed as predictive markers or targets in chemo-sensitization.

Keywords: Chemoresistance; Exome sequencing; Sensitization; Somatic variants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Expression of candidate genes correlated with breast cancer outcomes. Expression levels of candidate genes in Table 2 were analysed for correlations with survival from breast cancer using the METABRIC dataset [19], by comparing the distribution of levels between patients who died of their cancer to those that did not using ‘violin’ plots (left of each pair), and by Kaplan–Meier analyses after expression was dichotomized using receiver operator curve analyses into low and high groups (right of each pair). For violin plots, median and quartiles are shown (horizontal lines) and significance was tested using 2-tailed Mann–Whitney U tests. For Kaplan–Meier analyses, significance was tested using log rank tests. Significant correlations only are shown; PLXNA1 and SYNE1 were significant in only the first analysis

References

    1. Chawla A, Ferrone CR. Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer: an evolving paradigm shift. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1085. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01085. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gallagher KK, Ollila DW. Indications for neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer. Adv Surg. 2019;53:271–292. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2019.04.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karakatsanis A, Tasoulis MK, Warnberg F, Nilsson G, MacNeill F. Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant therapy and its impact in facilitating breast conservation in operable breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105(5):469–481. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10807. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cain H, Macpherson IR, Beresford M, Pinder SE, Pong J, Dixon JM. Neoadjuvant therapy in early breast cancer: treatment considerations and common debates in practice. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017;29(10):642–652. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.06.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li Z, Gao X, Peng X, May Chen MJ, Li Z, Wei B, Wen X, Wei B, Dong Y, Bu Z, Wu A, Wu Q, Tang L, Li Z, Liu Y, Zhang L, Jia S, Zhang L, Shan F, Zhang J, Wu X, Ji X, Ji K, Wu X, Shi J, Xing X, Wu J, Lv G, Shen L, Ji X, Liang H, Ji J. Multi-omics characterization of molecular features of gastric cancer correlated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Sci Adv. 2020;6(9):4211. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay4211. - DOI - PMC - PubMed