Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;46(1):284-294.
doi: 10.1111/coa.13616. Epub 2020 Oct 18.

Post-Treatment Head and Neck Cancer Care: National Audit and Analysis of Current Practice in the United Kingdom

INTEGRATE (The UK ENT Trainee Research Network)
Collaborators

Post-Treatment Head and Neck Cancer Care: National Audit and Analysis of Current Practice in the United Kingdom

INTEGRATE (The UK ENT Trainee Research Network). Clin Otolaryngol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to audit current United Kingdom (UK) practice of Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) post-treatment surveillance against national guidelines and determine the outcomes of these practices in detecting recurrence.

Design: National cross-sectional study of current HNC surveillance practice.

Setting: UK HNC outpatient departments.

Participants: HNC patients reviewed for post-treatment surveillance.

Main outcome measures: Compliance with UK multidisciplinary guidelines and rates of cancer recurrence detection by time, clinic type and symptoms.

Results: Data were analysed from 5,123 consultations across 89 UK centres. 30% of consultations were in dedicated multidisciplinary clinics, with input from allied health professionals (AHPs) available on the day in 23% of all consultations. Recurrence was suspected in 344 consultations and investigated with MRI in 29.6% (n = 102) and PET-CT in 14.2% (n = 49). Patient education regarding recurrence symptoms, and smoking and alcohol advice, was provided in 20.4%, 6.2% and 5.3% of cases, respectively. Rates of recurrence detected were 35% in expedited appointments and 5.2% in planned follow-ups (P = .0001). Of the expedited appointments, 63% were initiated by patients and 37% by clinicians. Recurrence was higher in those with new symptoms (7.1% versus 2.2%). The strongest predictors of recurrence were dyspnoea (positive predictive value (PPV)=16.2%), neck pain (PPV = 10.4%) and mouth/throat pain (PPV = 9.2%).

Conclusions: Dedicated multidisciplinary clinics comprise a minority of consultations for HNC surveillance in the UK, with low availability of AHPs. PET-CT and MRI were underutilised for the investigation of suspected recurrence. There may be scope for greater emphasis on patient education and consequent patient-initiated symptom-driven follow-up.

Keywords: audit; cancer; guidelines; head and neck; recurrence; surveillance; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Cohen EE , LaMonte SJ , Erb NL , et al. American Cancer Society Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:203-239.
    1. De Felice F , de Vincentiis M , Valentini V , et al. Follow-up program in head and neck cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2017;113:151-155.
    1. Simo R , Homer J , Clarke P , et al. Follow-up after treatment for head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. 2016;130:S208-S211.
    1. Kothari P , Trinidade A , Hewitt RJD , Singh A , O’Flynn P . The follow-up of patients with head and neck cancer: an analysis of 1,039 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268:1191-1200.
    1. Rocke J , Mclaren O , Hardman J , et al. The role of allied healthcare professionals in head and neck cancer surveillance: A systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol. 2020;45:83-98.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources