Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov;101(11):1133-1144.
doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001478. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

Viral interactions with non-homologous end-joining: a game of hide-and-seek

Affiliations
Review

Viral interactions with non-homologous end-joining: a game of hide-and-seek

Dayana B Hristova et al. J Gen Virol. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

There are extensive interactions between viruses and the host DNA damage response (DDR) machinery. The outcome of these interactions includes not only direct effects on viral nucleic acids and genome replication, but also the activation of host stress response signalling pathways that can have further, indirect effects on viral life cycles. The non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway is responsible for the rapid and imprecise repair of DNA double-stranded breaks in the nucleus that would otherwise be highly toxic. Whilst directly repairing DNA, components of the NHEJ machinery, in particular the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), can activate a raft of downstream signalling events that activate antiviral, cell cycle checkpoint and apoptosis pathways. This combination of possible outcomes results in NHEJ being pro- or antiviral depending on the infection. In this review we will describe the broad range of interactions between NHEJ components and viruses and their consequences for both host and pathogen.

Keywords: DNA damage; DNA-PK; NHEJ; PRR sensing; double-stranded break; virus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
NHEJ and antiviral innate immunity. Damaged self-DNA and foreign viral DNA are both sensed by the DDR machinery (HR and NHEJ). The DDR machinery is responsible for repairing damaged DNA and ensuring survival of the cell. It also leads to the activation of a number of stress response pathways, which determine the fate of the cell, such as apoptosis/senescence, cellular antiviral state, etc. This graphic emphasizes the role of an NHEJ component, the DNA-PK complex, in antiviral immunity. DNA-PK recognizes intracellular viral DNA and activates the IFN innate immune response through activation of the STING adaptor protein or possibly via the direct phosphorylation of the IRF3 transcription factor. The indicated viral proteins suppress the innate immune response by blocking the signalling pathway at various stages. DDR, DNA damage response; HR, homologous recombination; NHEJ, non-homologous end-joining; DNA-PK, DNA-dependent protein kinase; STING, stimulator of IFN genes; IRF3, IFN regulatory factor 3; DNA-PKcs, DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit; HSV ICP0, herpes simplex virus infected cell polypeptide 0; VACV, vaccinia virus; AdV, adenovirus.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Schematic diagram of the NHEJ pathway. Ku70/80 recognize and bind to free ends of DNA at double-stranded breaks. The kinase DNA-PKcs is recruited and phosphorylates a number of downstream targets, contributing to further end-processing of the DNA. Ligase 4 in complex with XRCC4, XLF and PAXX re-ligate the broken DNA ends. Various virus types interact with proteins at multiple steps of the NHEJ pathway. DNA-PKcs, DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit; XRCC4, X-ray cross-complementing protein 4; XLF, XRCC4-like factor; PAXX, paralogue of XRCC4 and XLF.

References

    1. Ciccia A, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol Cell. 2010;40:179–204. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature. 2009;461:1071–1078. doi: 10.1038/nature08467. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blackford AN, Jackson SP. Atm, ATR, and DNA-PK: the Trinity at the heart of the DNA damage response. Mol Cell. 2017;66:801–817. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trigg BJ, Ferguson BJ. Functions of DNA damage machinery in the innate immune response to DNA virus infection. Curr Opin Virol. 2015;15:56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2015.08.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weitzman MD, Lilley CE, Chaurushiya MS. Genomes in conflict: maintaining genome integrity during virus infection. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2010;64:61–81. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134016. - DOI - PubMed