Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 31;22(7):e16924.
doi: 10.2196/16924.

Digital Behavior Change Interventions for Younger Children With Chronic Health Conditions: Systematic Review

Amberly Brigden  1 , Emma Anderson  1 , Catherine Linney  1 , Richard Morris  2 , Roxanne Parslow  1 , Teona Serafimova  1 , Lucie Smith  1 , Emily Briggs  1 , Maria Loades  1   3 , Esther Crawley  1
Affiliations

Digital Behavior Change Interventions for Younger Children With Chronic Health Conditions: Systematic Review

Amberly Brigden et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of chronic health conditions in childhood is increasing, and behavioral interventions can support the management of these conditions. Compared with face-to-face treatment, the use of digital interventions may be more cost-effective, appealing, and accessible, but there has been inadequate attention to their use with younger populations (children aged 5-12 years).

Objective: This systematic review aims to (1) identify effective digital interventions, (2) report the characteristics of promising interventions, and (3) describe the user's experience of the digital intervention.

Methods: A total of 4 databases were searched (Excerpta Medica Database [EMBASE], PsycINFO, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online [MEDLINE], and the Cochrane Library) between January 2014 and January 2019. The inclusion criteria for studies were as follows: (1) children aged between 5 and 12 years, (2) interventions for behavior change, (3) randomized controlled trials, (4) digital interventions, and (5) chronic health conditions. Two researchers independently double reviewed papers to assess eligibility, extract data, and assess quality.

Results: Searches run in the databases identified 2643 papers. We identified 17 eligible interventions. The most promising interventions (having a beneficial effect and low risk of bias) were 3 targeting overweight or obesity, using exergaming or social media, and 2 for anxiety, using web-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Characteristics of promising interventions included gaming features, therapist support, and parental involvement. Most were purely behavioral interventions (rather than CBT or third wave), typically using the behavior change techniques (BCTs) feedback and monitoring, shaping knowledge, repetition and substitution, and reward. Three papers included qualitative data on the user's experience. We developed the following themes: parental involvement, connection with a health professional is important for engagement, technological affordances and barriers, and child-centered design.

Conclusions: Of the 17 eligible interventions, digital interventions for anxiety and overweight or obesity had the greatest promise. Using qualitative methods during digital intervention development and evaluation may lead to more meaningful, usable, feasible, and engaging interventions, especially for this underresearched younger population. The following characteristics could be considered when developing digital interventions for younger children: involvement of parents, gaming features, additional therapist support, behavioral (rather than cognitive) approaches, and particular BCTs (feedback and monitoring, shaping knowledge, repetition and substitution, and reward). This review suggests a model for improving the conceptualization and reporting of behavioral interventions involving children and parents.

Keywords: behavior; chronic illness; digital health; eHealth; electronic health; mHealth; mobile health; mobile phone; pediatrics; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram. RCT: randomized controlled trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conceptualising and reporting interventions involving both the parent/caregiver and the child. BCT: behavior change techniques.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lightfoot J, Mukherjee S, Sloper P. Supporting pupils with special health needs in mainstream schools: policy and practice. Child Soc. 2001 Apr;15(2):57–69. doi: 10.1002/chi.603. - DOI
    1. Perrin JM, Anderson LE, van Cleave J. The rise in chronic conditions among infants, children, and youth can be met with continued health system innovations. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014 Dec;33(12):2099–105. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0832. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mokkink LB, van der Lee JH, Grootenhuis MA, Offringa M, Heymans HSA, Dutch National Consensus Committee Chronic Diseases and Health Conditions in Childhood Defining chronic diseases and health conditions in childhood (0-18 years of age): national consensus in the Netherlands. Eur J Pediatr. 2008 Dec;167(12):1441–7. doi: 10.1007/s00431-008-0697-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eccleston C, Fisher E, Law E, Bartlett J, Palermo T. Psychological interventions for parents of children and adolescents with chronic illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 15;(4):CD009660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009660.pub3. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25874881 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bennett S, Shafran R, Coughtrey A, Walker S, Heyman I. Psychological interventions for mental health disorders in children with chronic physical illness: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2015 Apr;100(4):308–16. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307474. http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=25784736 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types