Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 31;15(7):e0236884.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236884. eCollection 2020.

Magnetic resonance imaging at ultra-high magnetic field strength: An in vivo assessment of number, size and distribution of pelvic lymph nodes

Affiliations

Magnetic resonance imaging at ultra-high magnetic field strength: An in vivo assessment of number, size and distribution of pelvic lymph nodes

Ansje S Fortuin et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: The definition of an in vivo nodal anatomical baseline is crucial for validation of representative lymph node dissections and accompanying pathology reports of pelvic cancers, as well as for assessing a potential therapeutic effect of extended lymph node dissections. Therefore the number, size and distribution of lymph nodes in the pelvis were assessed with high-resolution, large field-of-view, 7 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with frequency-selective excitation.

Materials and methods: We used 7 T MRI for homogeneous pelvic imaging in 11 young healthy volunteers. Frequency-selective imaging of water and lipids was performed to detect nodal structures in the pelvis. Number and size of detected nodes was measured and size distribution per region was assessed. An average volunteer-normalized nodal size distribution was determined.

Results: In total, 564 lymph nodes were detected in six pelvic regions. Mean number was 51.3 with a wide range of 19-91 lymph nodes per volunteer. Mean diameter was 2.3 mm with a range of 1 to 7 mm. 69% Was 2 mm or smaller. The overall size distribution was very similar to the average volunteer-normalized nodal size distribution.

Conclusions: The amount of in vivo visible lymph nodes varies largely between subjects, whereas the normalized size distribution of nodes does not. The presence of many small lymph nodes (≤2mm) renders representative or complete removal of pelvic lymph nodes to be very difficult. 7T MRI may shift the in vivo detection limits of lymph node metastases in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Water-selective images of the pelvis of a healthy volunteer.
(A) Coronal image with magnified detail in box. Yellow circle around the detected lymph node. (B) Transversal image with detail box. (C) Sagittal image with detail box. In all images the blue arrow points at a small lymph node, the red arrow at a blood vessel.
Fig 2
Fig 2. The number and size of pelvic lymph nodes in 11 volunteers.
(A) Number of nodes in each subject. (B) Size distribution of 564 lymph nodes. (C) Relative nodal size distribution: the mean (+ SD) of the individual relative size distributions of 11 subjects.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Distribution of pelvic lymph nodes in 11 healthy volunteers.
#: Mean number of lymph nodes per region. Ø: mean short-axis lymph node size in millimetres per region. CIA: Common iliac artery region. EIA: External iliac artery region. IIA: Internal iliac artery region. PS: Presacral region. Obt: Obturator region. PR: Pararectal region.

References

    1. McMahon CJ, Rofsky NM, Pedrosa I (2010) Lymphatic Metastases from Pelvic Tumors: Anatomic Classification, Characterization, and Staging. Radiology 254: 31–46. 10.1148/radiol.2541090361 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fossati N, Willemse P-PM, Van den Broeck T, van den Bergh RCN, Yuan CY, et al. (2017) The Benefits and Harms of Different Extents of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol. 72: 84–109. 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frost JA, Webster KE, Bryant A, Morrison J (2017) Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (10):CD007585 10.1002/14651858.CD007585.pub4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joniau S, Van den Bergh L, Lerut E, Deroose CM, Haustermans K, et al. (2013) Mapping of pelvic lymph node metastases in prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 63: 450–458. 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.057 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bellomi M, Bonomo G, Landoni F, Villa G, Leon ME, et al. (2005) Accuracy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of lymph node involvement in cervix carcinoma. Eur Radiol. 15: 2469–2474. 10.1007/s00330-005-2847-1 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources