Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 31;19(1):130.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01245-w.

Axes of alienation: applying an intersectional lens on the social contract during the pandemic response to protect sexual and reproductive rights and health

Affiliations

Axes of alienation: applying an intersectional lens on the social contract during the pandemic response to protect sexual and reproductive rights and health

Jashodhara Dasgupta et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

While economic inequalities have been a key focus of attention through the COVID 19 pandemic, gendered relations of power at every level have undermined health rights of women, girls and gender diverse individuals. Sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR) have always been sites of power contestations within families, societies, cultures, and politics; these struggles are exacerbated by economic, racial, religious, caste, citizenship status, and other social inequities, especially in times of crisis such as these. Policy responses to the COVID pandemic such as lockdown, quarantine, contact tracing and similar measures are premised on the existence of a social contract between the government and the people and among people, with the health sector playing a key role in preventive and curative care.We propose the use of an intersectional lens to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the social contract, drawing on our field experiences from different continents particularly as related to SRHR. Along with documenting the ways in which the pandemic hinders access to services, we note that it is essential to interrogate state-society relations in the context of vulnerable and marginalized groups, in order to understand implications for SRHR. Intersectional analysis takes on greater importance now than in non-pandemic times as the state exercises more police or other powers and deploys myriad ways of 'othering'.We conclude that an intersectional analysis should not limit itself to the cumulative disadvantages and injustices posed by the pandemic for specific social groups, but also examine the historical inequalities, structural drivers, and damaged social contract that underlie state-society relationships. At the same time, the pandemic has questioned the status quo and in doing so it has provided opportunities for disruption; for re-imagining a social contract that reaches across sectors, and builds community resilience and solidarities while upholding human rights and gender justice. This must find place in future organizing and advocacy around SRHR.

Keywords: Social contract; Intersectionality; Pandemic; SRHR/sexual and reproductive health and rights; Marginalized groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bowleg L. We’re Not All in This Together: On COVID-19, Intersectionality, and Structural Inequality. Am J Public Health. 2020;110(7):917–917. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305766. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lokot M, Avakyan Y. Intersectionality as a lens to the COVID-19 pandemic: implications for sexual and reproductive health in development and humanitarian contexts. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 (just-accepted):1–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 39. 1989.
    1. Gianella C, de Assis Machado MR, Gloppen S. Political determinants of sustainable development goals. Lancet. 2017;390(10112):2545–2546. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33082-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malta M, Wells S, LeGrand S, Seixas M, Baptista A, da Silva CM, Kalume C, Whetten K. Abortion in Brazil: the case for women's rights, lives, and choices. Lancet Public Health. 2019;4(11):e552. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30204-X. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources