Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 1;20(1):268.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01677-7.

Effects of a staff education programme about person-centred care and promotion of thriving on relatives' satisfaction with quality of care in nursing homes: a multi-centre, non-equivalent controlled before-after trial

Affiliations

Effects of a staff education programme about person-centred care and promotion of thriving on relatives' satisfaction with quality of care in nursing homes: a multi-centre, non-equivalent controlled before-after trial

Qarin Lood et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: As part of a nursing home intervention study, the aim of this paper was 1) to evaluate the effects of a staff education programme about person-centred care and promotion of thriving on relatives' satisfaction with quality of care and their perceptions of the person-centredness of the environment, and 2) to outline factors of importance to explain the variance in relatives' satisfaction with quality of care. Relatives are often referred to as vital for the operationalisation of person-centredness in nursing homes, representing an important source of information for care planning and quality of care assessments. However, the evidence for effects of person-centredness in nursing homes on relatives' experiences is sparse and little is known on what could explain their satisfaction with the quality of care.

Methods: A multi-centre, non-equivalent controlled group before-after design with study sites in Australia, Norway and Sweden. Staff in the intervention group participated in a 14-month education on person-centredness, person-centred care, thriving and caring environment. Staff in the control group received a one-hour lecture before the intervention period. Data were collected at baseline, after the intervention and six months after the end of the intervention, and analysed using descriptive statistics, a generalised linear model and hierarchical multiple regression.

Results: In general, relatives from both the intervention and control nursing homes were satisfied with the quality of care, and no statistically significant overall between-group-effects of the intervention were revealed on satisfaction with quality of care or perceptions of the person-centredness of environment. A person-centred environment in terms of safety and hospitality were identified as factors of prominent importance for the relatives' satisfaction with the quality of care.

Conclusion: The findings of this paper provide a foundation for future research in terms of intervention design in nursing home contexts. Staff availability, approachability, competence and communication with relatives may be important factors to consider to improve quality of care from the perspective of relatives, but more research both with and for relatives to people living in nursing homes is necessary to identify the keys to success.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov- NCT02714452 . Registered on March 19, 2016.

Keywords: Care home; Caring environment; Family members; Nursing; Older people; Person-centered care; Person-centred care; Residential aged care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart over inclusion of participants

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lood Q, Kirkevold M, Sjögren K, Bergland Å, Sandman P, Edvardsson D. Associations between person-centred climate and perceived quality of care in nursing homes: a cross-sectional study of relatives’ experiences. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(11):2526–2534. doi: 10.1111/jan.14011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bollig G, Gjengedal E, Rosland J. Nothing to complain about? Residents’ and relatives’ views on a “good life” and ethical challenges in nursing homes. Nurs Ethics. 2016;23(2):142–153. doi: 10.1177/0969733014557719. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCormack B, McCance T. Person-centred nursing: theory and practice. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
    1. Koren M. Person-centered care for nursing home residents: the culture-change movement. Health Aff. 2010;29(2):312–317. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0966. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grabowski D, O'Malley A, Afendulis C, Caudry D, Elliot A, Zimmerman S. Culture change and nursing home quality of care. The Gerontologist. 2014;54(S1):S35–S45. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt143. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data