Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 1;21(1):156.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01224-8.

General practitioners' perspectives on barriers to depression care: development and validation of a questionnaire

Arun Senchyna  1 , Milena Abbiati  2 , Juliette Chambe  3 , Dagmar M Haller  4 , Hubert Maisonneuve  4
Affiliations

General practitioners' perspectives on barriers to depression care: development and validation of a questionnaire

Arun Senchyna et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: General practitioners (GPs) regularly feel challenged by the care of depressed patients and may encounter several barriers in providing best management. GPs' perspectives on barriers to depression care are a subject of growing interest but there is a lack of validated assessment tools. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a questionnaire assessing barriers to depression care (BDC-Q) encountered by GPs in France and the French-speaking part of Switzerland.

Methods: The BDC-Q was constructed in five steps: Item development, content validation, pretesting, testing phase and test-retest reliability. The questionnaire items were generated through a literature search. An expert panel of GPs (n = 16) and psychiatrists (n = 3) validated the content and 20 GPs pretested the questionnaire to provide response process validity evidence. We then tested the questionnaire among 116 GPs and used principal component analysis and internal consistency testing (Cronbach's alpha) to structure it into consistent dimensions. Test-retest reliability using Pearson correlation coefficient was assessed with 30 GPs who completed the questionnaire twice after an interval of at least 2 weeks.

Results: The 25 items BDC-Q was structured in five dimensions: (i) provision of care by the general practitioner, (ii) considering patients' attitudes towards depression, (iii) guidance for care, (iv) collaboration with mental health specialists and (v) access to mental health care.

Conclusions: The BDC-Q displays evidence of validity and reliability to meaningfully assess GPs' perspectives on barriers to depression care. It can be used both at a practice level within a quality improvement strategy, and at a broader level, to inform health planners and tailor appropriate strategies to improve depression care in the community.

Keywords: Depression; General practitioners; Primary care; Questionnaire.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Dagmar M Haller is a member of the Editorial Board (Associate Editor) of BMC.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Development and validation steps of the barriers to depression care questionnaire (BDC-Q) with participants’ socio-demographic characteristics
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vos T, Allen C, Arora M, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1545–1602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rucci P. Subthreshold psychiatric disorders in primary care: prevalence and associated characteristics. J Affect Disord. 2003;76(1–3):171–181. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00087-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldberg D. Psychiatry and primary care. World Psychiatry. Published online 2003:5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitchell AJ, Vaze A, Rao S. Clinical diagnosis of depression in primary care: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;374(9690):609–619. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60879-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cepoiu M, McCusker J, Cole MG, Sewitch M, Belzile E, Ciampi A. Recognition of depression by non-psychiatric physicians—a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(1):25–36. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0428-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources