Outcomes of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation When Stratified by Age: How Old Is Too Old?
- PMID: 32740357
- DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001076
Outcomes of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation When Stratified by Age: How Old Is Too Old?
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival to hospital discharge for patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) when stratified by age. We performed a retrospective study at single, academic, tertiary care center intensive care unit for VV ECMO. All patients, older than 17 years of age, on VV ECMO admitted to a specialized intensive care unit for the management of VV ECMO between August 2014 and May 2018 were included in the study. Trauma and bridge-to-lung transplant patients were excluded for this analysis. Demographics, pre-ECMO and ECMO data were collected. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge when stratified by age. Secondary outcomes included time on VV ECMO and hospital length of stay (HLOS). One hundred eighty-two patients were included. Median P/F ratio at time of cannulation was 69 [56-85], and respiratory ECMO survival prediction (RESP) score was 3 [1-5]. Median time on ECMO was 319 [180-567] hours. Overall survival to hospital discharge was 75.8%. Lowess and cubic spline curves demonstrated an inflection point associated with increased mortality at age >45 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly greater survival in patients <45 years of age (p = 0.0001). Survival to hospital discharge for those <age 45 years was 84.6%. Comparatively, survival to hospital discharge for those ≥45 years was significantly lower (67.0%; p = 0.009), as was survival for those 55 years (57.1%; p = 0.001) and patients age ≥65 years (16.7%; p = 0.003). Patients 65 years of age and older treated with VV ECMO support for respiratory failure have low rates of survival to discharge. We have shown that age is an independent predictor of survival to discharge and beginning at age 45 years, in-hospital mortality increases incrementally. Moving forward we believe criteria and scoring systems for VV ECMO should include age as a variable.
Comment in
-
The Age Barrier for VV ECMO-Where Should It Be?ASAIO J. 2021 Jan 1;67(1):e56. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001274. ASAIO J. 2021. PMID: 33074861 No abstract available.
-
Indication for Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Is 65 Years Old, Too Old?ASAIO J. 2021 Jan 1;67(1):e55. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001273. ASAIO J. 2021. PMID: 33079731 No abstract available.
References
-
- Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, et al.; Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network: Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000.342: 1301–1308.
-
- Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, et al.; PROSEVA Study Group: Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013.368: 2159–2168.
-
- Papazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, et al.; ACURASYS Study Investigators: Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2010.363: 1107–1116.
-
- Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, et al.; CESAR trial collaboration: Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009.374: 1351–1363.
-
- Patroniti N, Zangrillo A, Pappalardo F, et al. The Italian ECMO network experience during the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic: Preparation for severe respiratory emergency outbreaks. Intensive Care Med 2011.37: 1447–1457.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources