Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul 20:6:2055207620942359.
doi: 10.1177/2055207620942359. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

How does the use of digital consulting change the meaning of being a patient and/or a health professional? Lessons from the Long-term Conditions Young People Networked Communication study

Affiliations
Review

How does the use of digital consulting change the meaning of being a patient and/or a health professional? Lessons from the Long-term Conditions Young People Networked Communication study

Jackie Sturt et al. Digit Health. .

Abstract

Background: While studies have examined the impact of digital communication technology on healthcare, there is little exploration of how new models of digital care change the roles and identities of the health professional and patient. The purpose of the current study is to generate multidisciplinary reflections and questions around the use of digital consulting and the way it changes the meaning of being a patient and/or a health professional.

Method: We used a large pre-existing qualitative dataset from the Long-term Conditions Young People Networked Communication (LYNC) study which involved interviews with healthcare professionals and a group of 16-24 years patients with long-term physical and mental health conditions. We conducted a three-stage mixed methods analysis. First, using a small sample of interview data from the LYNC study, we identified three key themes to explore in the data and relevant academic literature. Second, in small groups we conducted secondary analysis of samples of patient and health professional LYNC interview data. Third, we ran a series of rapid evidence reviews.

Findings: We identified three key themes: workload/flow, impact of increased access to healthcare and vulnerabilities. Both health professionals and patients were 'on duty' in their role more often. Increased access to healthcare introduced more responsibilities to both patients and health professionals. Traditional concepts in medical ethics, confidentiality, empathy, empowerment/power, efficiency and mutual responsibilities are reframed in the context of digital consulting.

Conclusions: Our collaboration identified conflicts and constraints in the construction of digital patients and digital clinicians. There is evidence that digital technologies change the nature of a medical consultation and with it the identities and the roles of clinicians and patients which, in turn, calls for a redefinition of traditional concepts of medical ethics. Overall, digital consulting has the potential to significantly reduce costs while maintaining or improving patient care and clinical outcomes. Timely study of digital engagement in the National Health Service is a matter of critical importance.

Keywords: Digital health; Long-term Conditions Young People Networked Communication; access; digital consulting; empowerment; healthcare professional; identity; patient; power; workload.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. NHS Digital. Information and technology for better care. Health and social care information strategy 2015–20. https://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/corporate-information-and-docum... (accessed September 2017).
    1. NHS England. The NHS long term plan. 2019. https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/ (accessed 1 July 2019).
    1. Meskó B, Drobni Z, Bényei É, et al. Digital health is a cultural transformation of traditional healthcare. Mhealth 2017; 3: 38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coulter A. What do patients and the public want from primary care? BMJ 2005; 331: 1199–1201. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wensing M, Jung HP, Mainz J, et al. A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. 1. Description of the research domain. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 1573–1578. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources