Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 29;10(6):173-182.
doi: 10.5500/wjt.v10.i6.173.

Living kidney donor assessment: Kidney length vs differential function

Jacob A Akoh  1 , Katharina J Schumacher  1
Affiliations

Living kidney donor assessment: Kidney length vs differential function

Jacob A Akoh et al. World J Transplant. .

Abstract

Background: The key question in living kidney donor assessment is how best to determine the contribution of each kidney to overall renal function and guide selection of which kidney to donate, ensuring safety of procedure and good outcome for both recipient and donor. It is thought that a length difference > 2 cm may indicate significant difference in function and therefore need for measurement of differential function.

Aim: To determine the effect of using kidney length to decide which kidney to donate in a retrospective cohort of potential donors.

Methods: All 333 potential living kidney donors between January 2009 and August 2018 who completed assessment were retrospectively evaluated. Donor assessment was performed as per United Kingdom guidelines. Data included age, sex, kidney length (cranio-caudal) obtained by computed tomography/ultrasono-graphy,51-chromium ethylenediamine tetraacetatic acid measured glomerular filtration rate, mercapto acetyl tri glycine split function and vascular anatomy. There were 48 exclusions due to inadequate data or incomplete investigations. Statistical analysis was performed using Excel pivot tables and GraphPad Prism. Correlation between kidney length and differential function was determined with Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results: Of 285 potential donors included in the study, there were 144 males (mean age 49.9 ± 14.75) and 141 females (mean age 51.2 ± 11.23). Overall, the Pearson's correlation between differences in length and divided function of kidney pairs was 0.1630, P = 0.0058. Of 73 with significant difference (> 10%) in divided function, 18 (24.7%) had no difference in kidney length; 54 (74%) had a difference of < 2 cm and only one of > 2 cm. Using a length difference of > 1 cm would only predict significant difference in divided function in 8/34 (23.5%) of cases. Using a difference of > 2 cm as cut off for performing split function would lead to false reassurance in 72 patients (6 had > 20% difference in divided function whereas 66 had 10%-20% difference).

Conclusion: Length difference between kidney pairs alone is not sufficient to replace measurement of divided function. This issue requires a randomised controlled trial to resolve it.

Keywords: Differential function; Glomerular filtration rate; Kidney length; Kidney transplantation; Kidney volume; Living kidney donor assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation of kidney length with divided function (differential function x donor glomerular filtration rate) for 285 kidney pairs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between difference in length and divided function of kidney pairs according to imaging modality. CT: Computed tomography; US: Ultrasonography.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlation between differences in length and function of 285 potential donors.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The frequency distribution of the differences in length and divided function between 285 kidney pairs.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mjøen G, Hallan S, Hartmann A, Foss A, Midtvedt K, Øyen O, Reisæter A, Pfeffer P, Jenssen T, Leivestad T, Line PD, Øvrehus M, Dale DO, Pihlstrøm H, Holme I, Dekker FW, Holdaas H. Long-term risks for kidney donors. Kidney Int. 2014;86:162–167. - PubMed
    1. British Transplantation Society/Renal Association. Guidelines for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation 2018. 4th ed. Available from: https://bts.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/FINAL_LDKT-guidelines_June... - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nunes-Carneiro D, Marques-Pinto A, Veiga C, Braga I, Cabral JF, Almeida M, Cavadas V, Castro-Henriques A, Almeida R, Fraga A, Silva-Ramos M. Which One Is the Best for Living Donation: A Multiple-Artery Left Kidney Nephrectomy or a Right Kidney Nephrectomy? Transplant Proc. 2019;51:1559–1562. - PubMed
    1. Akoh JA, Rana TA, Stacey SL. Isotope Differential Renal Function Versus Ultrasound Measured Kidney Size in Assessing Potential Living Donors. Dialysis Transplant. 2010;39:23–26.
    1. Ninan VT, Koshi KT, Niyamthullah MM, Jacob CK, Gopalakrishnan G, Pandey AP, Shastry JC. A comparative study of methods of estimating renal size in normal adults. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1990;5:851–854. - PubMed