Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;25(4):393-419.
doi: 10.1111/infa.12337. Epub 2020 May 7.

Robust data and power in infant research: A case study of the effect of number of infants and number of trials in visual preference procedures

Michaela C DeBolt  1   2 , Mijke Rhemtulla  2 , Lisa M Oakes  1   2
Affiliations

Robust data and power in infant research: A case study of the effect of number of infants and number of trials in visual preference procedures

Michaela C DeBolt et al. Infancy. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

As in many areas of science, infant research suffers from low power. The problem is further compounded in infant research because of the difficulty in recruiting and testing large numbers of infant participants. Researchers have been searching for a solution and, as illustrated by this special section, have been focused on getting the most out of infant data. We illustrate one solution by showing how we can increase power in visual preference tasks by increasing the amount of data obtained from each infant. We discuss issues of power and present work examining how, under some circumstances, power is increased by increasing the precision of measurement. We report the results of a series of simulations based on a sample of visual preference task data collected from three infant laboratories showing how more powerful research designs can be achieved by including more trials per infant. Implications for infant procedures in general are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Amso, D., & Johnson, S. P. (2006). Learning by selection: Visual search and object perception in young infants. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1236–1245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012‐1649.42.6.1236
    1. Aslin, R. N. (2007). What’s in a look? Developmental Science, 10(1), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐7687.2007.00563.x
    1. Bakker, M., van Dijk, A., & Wicherts, J. M. (2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459060
    1. Bergmann, C., Tsuji, S., Piccinini, P. E., Lewis, M. L., Braginsky, M., Frank, M. C., & Cristia, A. (2018). Promoting replicability in developmental research through meta‐analyses: Insights from language acquisition research. Child Development, 89(6), 1996–2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13079
    1. Boudewyn, M. A., Luck, S. J., Farrens, J. L., & Kappenman, E. S. (2018). How many trials does it take to get a significant ERP effect? It depends. Psychophysiology, 55(6), e13049. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13049

Publication types