Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2021 Mar 1;113(3):231-233.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa106.

The Orderly Incorporation of Continuing Technologic Advances Into Cervical Cancer Screening

Affiliations
Comment

The Orderly Incorporation of Continuing Technologic Advances Into Cervical Cancer Screening

Mark Schiffman et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

  • p16/ki67 and E6/E7 mRNA Accuracy and Prognostic Value in Triaging HPV DNA-Positive Women.
    Giorgi Rossi P, Carozzi F, Ronco G, Allia E, Bisanzi S, Gillio-Tos A, De Marco L, Rizzolo R, Gustinucci D, Del Mistro A, Frayle H, Confortini M, Iossa A, Cesarini E, Bulletti S, Passamonti B, Gori S, Toniolo L, Barca A, Bonvicini L, Mancuso P, Venturelli F, Benevolo M; the New Technology for Cervical Cancer 2 Working Group. Giorgi Rossi P, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Mar 1;113(3):292-300. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa105. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021. PMID: 32745170 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Rossi PG, Carozzi F, Ronco G, et al. NTCC2 Working Group. p16/ki67 and E6/E7 mRNA accuracy and prognostic value in triaging HPV DNA positive women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020.
    1. Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, et al. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2014;383(9916):524–532. - PubMed
    1. Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, et al. 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020;24(2):102–131. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Polman NJ, Ebisch RMF, Heideman DAM, et al. Performance of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse: a randomised, paired screen-positive, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(2):229–238. - PubMed
    1. Arbyn M, Verdoodt F, Snijders PJ, et al. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(2):172–183. - PubMed