Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct:103:104127.
doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104127. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

Acylphloroglucinols with acetylcholinesterase inhibitory effects from the fruits of Eucalyptus robusta

Affiliations

Acylphloroglucinols with acetylcholinesterase inhibitory effects from the fruits of Eucalyptus robusta

Hui Liu et al. Bioorg Chem. 2020 Oct.

Erratum in

Abstract

Eleven new acylphloroglucinols, including six new formylated phloroglucinol-monoterpene meroterpenoids, eucalyprobusals A-F (1-6), one monomeric acylphloroglucinol, eucalyprobusone B (7), and four dimeric acylphloroglucinols, eucalyprobusones C-F (8-11) were purified from the fruits of Eucalyptus robusta. The establishment of the structures of 1-11 was achieved by a combination of NMR and HRESIMS data analyses, electron circular dichroism (ECD), and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Compounds 6, 8, and an inseparable mixture of 10 and 11 were found to be potent AChE inhibitors with IC50 values of 3.22 ± 0.36, 3.82 ± 0.22, and 2.55 ± 0.28 μΜ, respectively. Possible interaction sites of 6, 8, 10, and 11 with AChE were investigated by means of molecular docking studies, and the results revealed that AChE residues Asn87, Ser125, Thr83, Tyr133, Tyr124, Tyr337, and Tyr341 played crucial roles in the observed activity of the aforementioned compounds.

Keywords: Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory effect; Acylphloroglucinols; Eucalyptus robusta; Molecular docking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Structures of 111 isolated from E. robusta.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Selected 1H–1H COSY (blue bold line) and HMBC (red arrow) correlations of 111.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
ORTEP drawing of 1.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Calculated and experimental ECD spectra for 2.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Calculated and experimental ECD spectra for 3.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Calculated and experimental ECD spectra for 4.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Calculated and experimental ECD spectra for 5.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
Calculated and experimental ECD spectra of (±)-6.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.
Calculated and experimental ECD spectra of (±)-8.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 10.
ORTEP drawing of (±)-10 and (±)-11.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 11.
The binding modes of 6 (A), 8 (B), 10 (C), and 11 (D) with human AChE (PDB ID: 4M0F). Hydrogen bond interactions are depicted with red dashes, while π–π and π–σ stacking interactions are displayed with yellow and green dashes, respectively.

References

    1. Ghisalberti EL, Phytochemistry 41 (1996) 7–22. - PubMed
    1. Yu Y, Gan LS, Yang SP, Sheng L, Liu QF, Chen SN, Li J, Yue JM, J. Nat. Prod 79 (2016) 1365–1372. - PubMed
    1. Pham TA, Hu XL, Huang XJ, Ma MX, Feng JH, Li JY, Hou JQ, Zhang PL, Nguyen VH, Nguyen MT, Xiong F, Fan CL, Zhang XQ, Ye WC, Wang H, J. Nat. Prod 82 (2019) 859–869. - PubMed
    1. Shang ZC, Han C, Xu JL, Liu RH, Yin Y, Wang XB, Yang MH, Kong LY, Phytochemistry 163 (2019) 111–117. - PubMed
    1. Li RH, Shang ZC, Li TX, Yang MH, Kong LY, Antimicrob. Agents Ch 61 (2017) e02702–16. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources