Early detection of type 2 diabetes in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas in Stockholm - comparing reach of community and facility-based screening
- PMID: 32746747
- PMCID: PMC7480601
- DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1795439
Early detection of type 2 diabetes in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas in Stockholm - comparing reach of community and facility-based screening
Abstract
Background: Type 2 diabetes and its high-risk stage, prediabetes, are often undiagnosed. Early detection of these conditions is of importance to avoid organ complications due to the metabolic disturbances associated with diabetes. Diabetes screening can detect persons unaware of diabetes risk and the elevated glucose levels can potentially be reversed through lifestyle modification and medication. There are mainly two approaches to diabetes screening: opportunistic facility-based screening at health facilities and community screening.
Objective: To determine the difference in population reach and participant characteristics between community- and facility-based screening for detection of type 2 diabetes and persons at high risk of developing diabetes.
Methods: Finnish diabetes risk score (FINDRISC) is a risk assessment tool used by two diabetes projects to conduct community- and facility-based screenings in disadvantaged suburbs of Stockholm. In this study, descriptive and limited inferential statistics were carried out analyzing data from 2,564 FINDRISC forms from four study areas. Community- and facility-based screening was compared in terms of participant characteristics and with population data from the respective areas to determine their reach.
Results: Our study found that persons born in Africa and Asia were reached through community screening to a higher extent than with facility-based screening, while persons born in Sweden and other European countries were reached more often by facility-based screening. Also, younger persons were reached more frequently through community screening compared with facility-based screening. Both types of screening reached more women than men.
Conclusion: Community-based screening and facility-based screening were complementary methods in reaching different population groups at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Community screening in particular reached more hard-to-reach groups with unfavorable risk profiles, making it a critical strategy for T2D prevention. More men should be recruited to intervention studies and screening initiatives to achieve a gender balance.
Keywords: Community screening; FINDRISC; T2D; facility-based screening; hard-to-reach; opportunistic screening; prediabetes.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- International Diabetes Federation . IDF diabetes atlas; 2019. [cited 2019 December9]. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org/en/sections/proven-and-effective-actions.html
-
- Hälso- och Sjukvårdsförvaltningen . Diabetes i primärvården 2013; 2014. Available from: https://www.vardgivarguiden.se/globalassets/utbildning-och-utveckling/va...
-
- Bennet L, Groop L, Lindblad U, et al. Ethnicity is an independent risk indicator when estimating diabetes risk with FINDRISC scores: a cross sectional study comparing immigrants from the Middle East and native Swedes. Prim Care Diabetes. 2014;8:231–10. - PubMed
-
- Wändell PE, Gåfvels C.. High prevalence of diabetes among immigrants from non-European countries in Sweden. Prim Care Diabetes. 2007;1:13–16. - PubMed
-
- Tao W, Bruce D, Burström B. Områdesskillnader i sjukdomsförekomst Stockholms län 2006–2011; 2015. Available from: http://dok.slso.sll.se/CES/FHG/Jamlik_halsa/Rapporter/Omradesskillnader-...
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical