Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;46(1):226-245.
doi: 10.1111/disa.12455. Epub 2021 Oct 8.

Post-conflict disaster governance in Nepal: one-door policy, multiple-window practice

Samantha Melis  1
Affiliations

Post-conflict disaster governance in Nepal: one-door policy, multiple-window practice

Samantha Melis. Disasters. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

The response to the earthquakes in Nepal on 25 April and 12 May 2015 was as overwhelming as the magnitude of the events themselves. Tensions between the humanitarian imperative and the post-conflict state-building agenda soon became evident. Many actors offered support by creatively complying with the state's approach, whereas others bypassed official channels completely. In post-conflict settings such as Nepal, the situation is especially complicated because of the contradiction between policies underscoring the importance of the state in the response and the reality of the fragility of the state, which often leads to the significant involvement of aid organisations. The post-conflict political landscape of Nepal shaped the contours of the response, as well as how actors decided to operate within them. This paper, based on empirical findings from four months of research, contributes to a better understanding of the intricacies of the post-conflict and post-disaster nexus in the context of a state-led response.

Keywords: Nepal; disaster response; disaster risk reduction (DRR); earthquake; governance; humanitarian aid; post conflict; state-building.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Spectrum of compliancy Source: author.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adhikari, M. (2014) ‘Politics and perceptions of Indian aid to Nepal’. Strategic Analysis. 38(3). pp. 325–340.
    1. Bellamy, A.J. (2004) ‘Motives, outcomes, intent and the legitimacy of humanitarian intervention’. Journal of Military Ethics. 3(3). pp. 216–232.
    1. Bennett, C. , Foley M., and Pantuliano S. (2016) Time to Let Go: Remaking Humanitarian Action for the Modern Era. HPG Briefing. April. Humanitarian Policy Group, Overseas Development Institute, London.
    1. Bhatta, C.D. (2013) ‘External influence and challenges of state‐building in Nepal’. Asian Journal of Political Science. 21(2). pp. 169–188.
    1. Boersma, K. , Ferguson J., Mulder F., and Wolbers J. (2016) Humanitarian Response Coordination and Cooperation in Nepal: Coping with Challenges and Dilemmas. White Paper. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam.