Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Aug 4;9(15):e016009.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.016009. Epub 2020 Jul 28.

Associations of Left Ventricular Structure and Function With Blood Pressure in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Analysis of the TOPCAT Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Associations of Left Ventricular Structure and Function With Blood Pressure in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Analysis of the TOPCAT Trial

Fang-Fei Wei et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background Data on the association of systolic and diastolic blood pressure with the structure and function of failing hearts with preserved ejection fraction (EF) are sparse. Methods and Results This analysis included 935 patients with heart failure (49.4% women; mean age, 69.9 years) with preserved EF (≥45%) enrolled in the TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist) Trial before initiation of randomized therapy. Left ventricular (LV) structure (dimensions, wall thickness, and mass index), diastolic function (left atrial volume index, transmitral blood flow, and mitral annular velocities), and systolic function (EF and longitudinal strain) were assessed echocardiographically. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, association sizes expressed per 1-SD (14.8-mm Hg) increment in systolic blood pressure were 0.020 cm (P=0.003) and 0.018 cm (P=0.004) for LV septal and posterior wall thickness, respectively, and 2.42 mg/m2 (P=0.018) for LV mass index. The corresponding associations with diastolic blood pressure were nonsignificant (P≥0.067). In similarly adjusted analyses, the association sizes expressed per 1-SD (10.7-mm Hg) increment in diastolic blood pressure were -0.15 for E/A (P<0.001), -0.76 for E/e' (P=0.006), and -0.62% for EF (P=0.024). These findings were consistent, if models including systolic blood pressure were additionally adjusted for diastolic blood pressure and vice versa, albeit that the relation of EF with diastolic blood pressure weakened (-0.54%; P=0.10). Conclusions In diastolic heart failure, LV wall thickness and LV mass index increased with higher systolic blood pressure, but not with higher diastolic blood pressure, whereas functional measures reflecting diastolic LV function decreased with higher diastolic blood pressure, independent of systolic blood pressure. These observations highlight the importance of controlling both systolic and diastolic blood pressure as modifiable risk factors to reduce the risk of LV remodeling and diastolic LV dysfunction.

Keywords: blood pressure; diastolic heart failure; echocardiography; hypertension; left ventricle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Multivariable‐adjusted associations of the left ventricular (LV) mass index (A) and E wave/peak early diastolic tissue velocity (E/e′) (B) with systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
The plane shows the independent associations of LV mass index and E/e′ with SBP and DBP. The plotted plane was standardized to the mean distribution in the whole study patients of sex, age, ethnicity, body mass index, heart rate, current smoking, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, use of antihypertensive medications by drug class (ie, diuretics, β blockers, inhibitors of the renin‐angiotensin system, and calcium channel blockers), and intake of aspirin, lipid‐lowering drugs, other cardiovascular medications, and antidiabetic agents.

References

    1. Li Y, Staessen JA, Sheng CS, Huang QF, O'Rourke M, Wang JG. Age dependency of peripheral and central systolic pressures: cross‐sectional and longitudinal observations in a Chinese population. Hypertens Res. 2012;115–122. - PubMed
    1. Clement DL, De Buyzere ML, De Bacquer DA, de Leeuw PW, Duprez DA, Fagard RH, Gheeraert PJ, Missault LH, Braun JJ, Six RO, et al. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood‐pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2003;2407–2415. - PubMed
    1. Sheppard JP, Tucker KL, Davison WJ, Stevens R, Aekplakorn W, Bosworth HB, Bove A, Earle K, Godwin M, Green BB, et al. Self‐monitoring of blood pressure in patients with hypertension‐related multi‐morbidity: systematic review and individual patient data meta‐analysis. Am J Hypertens. 2019;243–251. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ettehad D, Emdin CA, Kiran A, Anderson SG, Callender T, Emberson J, Chalmers J, Rodgers A, Rahimi K. Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet. 2016;957–967. - PubMed
    1. Kannel WB, Schwartz MJ, McNamara PM. Blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Heart Study. Chest. 1969;43–51. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms