Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;24(12):3421-3430.
doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2020.3001019. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

Attention-Guided 3D-CNN Framework for Glaucoma Detection and Structural-Functional Association Using Volumetric Images

Attention-Guided 3D-CNN Framework for Glaucoma Detection and Structural-Functional Association Using Volumetric Images

Yasmeen George et al. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

The direct analysis of 3D Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) volumes enables deep learning models (DL) to learn spatial structural information and discover new bio-markers that are relevant to glaucoma. Downsampling 3D input volumes is the state-of-art solution to accommodate for the limited number of training volumes as well as the available computing resources. However, this limits the network's ability to learn from small retinal structures in OCT volumes. In this paper, our goal is to improve the performance by providing guidance to DL model during training in order to learn from finer ocular structures in 3D OCT volumes. Therefore, we propose an end-to-end attention guided 3D DL model for glaucoma detection and estimating visual function from retinal structures. The model consists of three pathways with the same network architecture but different inputs. One input is the original 3D-OCT cube and the other two are computed during training guided by the 3D gradient class activation heatmaps. Each pathway outputs the class-label and the whole model is trained concurrently to minimize the sum of losses from three pathways. The final output is obtained by fusing the predictions of the three pathways. Also, to explore the robustness and generalizability of the proposed model, we apply the model on a classification task for glaucoma detection as well as a regression task to estimate visual field index (VFI) (a value between 0 and 100). A 5-fold cross-validation with a total of 3782 and 10,370 OCT scans is used to train and evaluate the classification and regression models, respectively. The glaucoma detection model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 93.8% compared with 86.8% for a baseline model without the attention-guided component. The model also outperformed six different feature based machine learning approaches that use scanner computed measurements for training. Further, we also assessed the contribution of different retinal layers that are relevant to glaucoma. The VFI estimation model achieved a Pearson correlation and median absolute error of 0.75 and 3.6%, respectively, for a test set of size 3100 cubes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Framework of the proposed attention-guided DL model using 3D OCT volumes (AG-OCT)
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Training losses for glaucoma detection using AG-OCT model
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Grad-CAM attention maps. First row shows overlaid grad-CAM heatmap for enface view while second and third rows show b-scan slices# 50 and 100 in order
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Visualization and abbreviation of different retinal layers in OCT scan. The left image is taken from this paper [50]
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Segmentation method results adopted from [49] for clinical assessment of retinal structures relevant to glaucoma. (a) original b-scan slice, (b) ground truth, (c) segmentation results based on the method described in [49]
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Contribution of different retinal layers for glaucoma detection using the proposed AG-OCT model

References

    1. Flaxman SR, Bourne RR, Resnikoff S, Ackland P, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, Das A, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, Kempen JH et al., “Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” The Lancet Global Health, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. e1221–e1234, 2017. - PubMed
    1. Davis BM, Crawley L, Pahlitzsch M, Javaid F, and Cordeiro MF, “Glaucoma: the retina and beyond,” Acta neuropathologica, vol. 132, no. 6, pp. 807–826, 2016. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lucy KA and Wollstein G, “Structural and functional evaluations for the early detection of glaucoma,” Expert review of ophthalmology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 367–376, 2016. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Broadway DC, “Visual field testing for glaucoma–a practical guide,” Community eye health, vol. 25, no. 79–80, p. 66, 2012. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peracha M, Hughes B, Tannir J, Momi R, Goyal A, Juzych M, Kim C, McQueen M, Eby A, and Fatima F, “Assessing the reliability of humphrey visual field testing in an urban population,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 54, no. 15, pp. 3920–3920, 2013.

Publication types

MeSH terms