Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 31;20(15):4283.
doi: 10.3390/s20154283.

goFOODTM: An Artificial Intelligence System for Dietary Assessment

Affiliations

goFOODTM: An Artificial Intelligence System for Dietary Assessment

Ya Lu et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Accurate estimation of nutritional information may lead to healthier diets and better clinical outcomes. We propose a dietary assessment system based on artificial intelligence (AI), named goFOODTM. The system can estimate the calorie and macronutrient content of a meal, on the sole basis of food images captured by a smartphone. goFOODTM requires an input of two meal images or a short video. For conventional single-camera smartphones, the images must be captured from two different viewing angles; smartphones equipped with two rear cameras require only a single press of the shutter button. The deep neural networks are used to process the two images and implements food detection, segmentation and recognition, while a 3D reconstruction algorithm estimates the food's volume. Each meal's calorie and macronutrient content is calculated from the food category, volume and the nutrient database. goFOODTM supports 319 fine-grained food categories, and has been validated on two multimedia databases that contain non-standardized and fast food meals. The experimental results demonstrate that goFOODTM performed better than experienced dietitians on the non-standardized meal database, and was comparable to them on the fast food database. goFOODTM provides a simple and efficient solution to the end-user for dietary assessment.

Keywords: calorie; carbohydrate; computer vision; fat; nutrient estimation; protein; smartphone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of goFOODTM.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The application: (a) goFOODTMLite—two images capturing (b) goFOODTMLite—Video recording.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The application: (a) goFOODTM—Successful automatic segmentation; (b) goFOODTM— Failed automatic segmentation due to bad lighting [left]—Manual user input [middle]— Successful semi-automatic segmentation [right]; (c) goFOODTM—Automatic Recognition.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The food categories are organized in a three-level hierarchy. The green labels indicate fine-grained food categories supported by the system, while the gray and blue labels are the concluded first and second level hyper food categories, respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Some example meal images in (a) MADiMa and (b) Fast food Databases.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Examples of correctly and incorrectly recognized food images.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Bland–Altman plots of goFOODTM’s and dietitians’ estimations on the MADiMa database in terms of (a) CHO, (b) PRO, (c) FAT and (d) Calories. The dashed lines indicate the 95% confidence interval of goFOODTM (blue) and the dietitians’ estimations (red).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Bland–Altman plots of goFOODTM’s and dietitians’ estimations on the Fast Food database in terms of (a) CHO, (b) PRO, (c) FAT and (d) Calories. The dashed lines indicate the 95% confidence interval of goFOODTM (blue) and the dietitians’ estimations (red).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Diabetes Association Cardiovascular disease and risk management: Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:S111–S134. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2017. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:917–928. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smart C.E., King B.R., McElduff P., Collins C.E. In children using intensive insulin therapy, a 20-g variation in carbohydrate amount significantly impacts on postprandial glycaemia. Diabet. Med. 2012;29:e21–e24. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03595.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brazeau A.S., Mircescu H., Desjardins K., Leroux C., Strychar I., Ekoé J.M., Rabasa-Lhoret R. Carbohydrate counting accuracy and blood glucose variability in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2013;99:19–23. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.10.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Franziska K.B., David M.M., Gail S., Darcy O., Georgeanna J.K., Andrey B., Joan T., Elizabeth J.M. The carbohydrate counting in adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes (CCAT) Study. Diabetes Spectr. 2009;22:56–62.

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources