Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul 31;21(15):5489.
doi: 10.3390/ijms21155489.

Proteomic Research in Peritoneal Dialysis

Affiliations
Review

Proteomic Research in Peritoneal Dialysis

Mario Bonomini et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an established home care, cost-effective renal replacement therapy (RRT), which offers several advantages over the most used dialysis modality, hemodialysis. Despite its potential benefits, however, PD is an under-prescribed method of treating uremic patients. Infectious complications (primarily peritonitis) and bio-incompatibility of PD solutions are the main contributors to PD drop-out, due to their potential for altering the functional and anatomical integrity of the peritoneal membrane. To improve the clinical outcome of PD, there is a need for biomarkers to identify patients at risk of PD-related complications and to guide personalized interventions. Several recent studies have shown that proteomic investigation may be a powerful tool in the prediction, early diagnosis, prognostic assessment, and therapeutic monitoring of patients on PD. Indeed, analysis of the proteome present in PD effluent has uncovered several proteins involved in inflammation and pro-fibrotic insult, in encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis, or even in detecting early changes before any measurable modifications occur in the traditional clinical parameters used to evaluate PD efficacy. We here review the proteomic studies conducted thus far, addressing the potential use of such omics methodology in identifying potential new biomarkers of the peritoneal membrane welfare in relation to dialytic prescription and adequacy.

Keywords: biomarker; end-stage renal disease; peritoneal dialysis; peritoneal dialysis effluent; peritoneum; proteomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.A. is an employee of CoreQuest, a research and development company based in Switzerland. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Howell M., Walker R.C., Howard K. Cost effectiveness of dialysis modalities: A systemic review of economic evaluations. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy. 2019;17:315–330. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-00455-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Baal J.O., Van de Vijver K.K., Nieuwland R., Van Noorden C.J., Van Driel W.J., Sturk A., Kenter G.G., Rokkert L.G., Lok C.A.R. The histophysiology and pathophysiology of the peritoneum. Tissue Cell. 2017;49:95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2016.11.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gokal R., Mallick R.P. Peritoneal dialysis. Lancet. 1999;353:823–828. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09410-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartosova M., Schmitt C.P. Biocompatible peritoneal dialysis: The target is still way off. Front. Physiol. 2019;9:1853. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01853. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mehrotra R., Devuyst O., Davies S.J., Johnson D.W. The current state of peritoneal dialysis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016;27:3238–3252. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016010112. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources