Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2020 Aug 4;24(1):482.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03184-y.

Compared to NIPPV, HFNC is more dangerous regarding aerosol dispersion and contamination of healthcare personnel: we are not sure

Affiliations
Comment

Compared to NIPPV, HFNC is more dangerous regarding aerosol dispersion and contamination of healthcare personnel: we are not sure

Patrick M Honore et al. Crit Care. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare to have no competing interests.

Comment on

References

    1. Remy KE, Lin JC, Verhoef PA. High-flow nasal cannula may be no safer than non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for COVID-19 patients. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02892-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alhazzani W, Moller MH, Arabi YM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Crit Care Med Released on March 20. PMID: 32224769. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004363. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whittle JS, Pavlov I, Sacchetti AD, Atwood C, Rosenberg MS. Respiratory support for adult patients with COVID-19. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2020;10.1002/emp2.12071. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12071. Online ahead of print. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hui DS, Chow BK, Lo T, et al. Exhaled air dispersion during high-flow nasal cannula therapy versus CPAP via different masks. Eur Respir J 2019;53(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02339-2018. - PubMed
    1. Remy KE, Lin JC, Verhoef PA. High-flow nasal cannula may be no safer than non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for COVID-19 patients. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02892-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources