Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Sep 8;95(10):e1322-e1332.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010433. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

Emulating a target trial of statin use and risk of dementia using cohort data

Affiliations
Observational Study

Emulating a target trial of statin use and risk of dementia using cohort data

Ellen C Caniglia et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Objective: Observational data can be used to attempt to emulate a target trial of statin use and estimate analogues of intention-to-treat and per protocol effects on dementia risk.

Methods: Using data from a prospective cohort study in the Netherlands, we conceptualized a sequence of "trials" in which eligible individuals ages 55-80 years were classified as statin initiators or noninitiators for every consecutive month between 1993 and 2007 and were followed until diagnosis of dementia, death, loss to follow-up, or the end of follow-up. We estimated 2 types of effects of statin use on dementia and a combined endpoint of dementia or death: the effect of initiation vs no initiation and the effect of sustained use vs no use. We estimated risk by statin treatment strategy over time via pooled logistic regression. We used inverse-probability weighting to account for treatment-confounder feedback in estimation of per-protocol effects.

Results: Of 233,526 eligible person-trials (6,373 individuals), there were 622 initiators and 232,904 noninitiators. Comparing statin initiation with no initiation, the 10-year risk differences (95% confidence interval) were -0.1% (-2.3% to 1.8%) for dementia and 0.3% (-2.7% to 3.3%) for dementia or death. Comparing sustained statin use vs no use, the 10-year risk differences were -2.2% (-5.2% to 1.6%) for dementia and -5.1% (-10.5% to -1.1%) for dementia or death.

Conclusions: Individuals with sustained statin use, but not statin initiation alone, had reduced 10-year risks of dementia and dementia or death. Our results should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of initiators and events and potential for residual confounding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of person-trials in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, Rotterdam Study
BMI = body mass index; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; SBP = systolic blood pressure.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Modified intention-to-treat 10-year dementia-free and dementia-free survival curves
(A) Dementia-free and (B) dementia-free survival curves. The curves are standardized to the following covariates, measured at the baseline of each “trial”: sex, educational attainment, APOE ε4 carrier status, calendar year, age, body mass index, most recent Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), months since most recent MMSE, most recent cholesterol measurement, months since the most recent cholesterol measurement, most recent systolic blood pressure measurement, current smoking status, history of stroke, history of heart disease (defined as any history of atrial fibrillation, heart failure, myocardial infarction, or revascularization), history of diabetes, history of cancer, and use of the following other prescription medications: antihypertensives, diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors, other lipid-lowering drugs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, psychotropics (antidepressants, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines), and aspirin.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Per-protocol 10-year dementia-free and dementia-free survival curves
(A) Dementia-free and (B) dementia-free survival curves. The curves are standardized to the following covariates, measured at the baseline of each “trial”: sex, educational attainment, APOE ε4 carrier status, calendar year, age, body mass index, most recent Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), months since most recent MMSE, most recent cholesterol measurement, months since the most recent cholesterol measurement, most recent systolic blood pressure measurement, current smoking status, history of stroke, history of heart disease (defined as any history of atrial fibrillation, heart failure, myocardial infarction, or revascularization), history of diabetes, history of cancer, and use of the following other prescription medications: antihypertensives, diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors, other lipid-lowering drugs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, psychotropics (antidepressants, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines), and aspirin.

References

    1. Hernan MA, Hernandez-Diaz S. Beyond the intention-to-treat in comparative effectiveness research. Clin Trials 2012;9:48–55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Naci H, Brugts JJ, Fleurence R, Tsoi B, Toor H, Ades AE. Comparative benefits of statins in the primary and secondary prevention of major coronary events and all-cause mortality: a network meta-analysis of placebo-controlled and active-comparator trials. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2013;20:641–657. - PubMed
    1. Taylor F, Huffman MD, Macedo AF, et al. . Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;1:Cd004816. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Udell JA, Ray JG. Primary and secondary prevention of heart failure with statins. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2006;4:917–926. - PubMed
    1. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002;360:7–22. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances