Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;15(3):489-495.
doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01131-1. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

Learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery

Affiliations

Learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery

Yosef Nasseri et al. J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

With the rapid adoption of robotics in colorectal surgery, there has been growing interest in the pace at which surgeons gain competency, as it may aid in self-assessment or credentialing. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the learning curve of an expert laparoscopic colorectal surgeon who performed a variety of colorectal procedures robotically. This is a retrospective review of a prospective database of 111 subsequent colorectal procedures performed by a single colorectal surgeon. The cumulative summation technique (CUSUM) was used to construct a learning curve for robotic proficiency by analyzing total operative and console times. Postoperative outcomes including length of stay, 30-day complications, and 30-day readmission rates were evaluated. Chi-square and one-way ANOVA (including Kruskal-Wallis) tests were used to evaluate categorical and continuous variables. Our patient cohort had a mean age of 62.4, mean BMI of 26.9, and mean ASA score of 2.41. There were two conversions to open surgery. The CUSUM graph for console time indicated an initial decrease at case 13 and another decrease at case 83, generating 3 distinct performance phases: learning (n = 13), competence (n = 70), and mastery (n = 28). An interphase comparison revealed no significant differences in age, gender, BMI, ASA score, types of procedures, or indications for surgery between the three phases. Over the course of the study, both mean surgeon console time and median length of stay decreased significantly (p = 0.00017 and p = 0.016, respectively). Although statistically insignificant, there was a downward trend in total operative time and postoperative complication rates. Learning curves for robotic colorectal surgery are commonly divided into three performance phases. Our findings contribute to the construction of a reliable learning curve for the transition of colorectal surgeons to robotics. Furthermore, they may help guide the stepwise training and credentialing of new robotic surgeons.

Keywords: Colorectal; Cumulative sum analysis; Learning curve; Robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Zelhart M, Kaiser AM (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: towards defining criteria to the right choice. Surg Endosc 32(1):24–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5796-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Catanzarite T, Tan-Kim J, Whitcomb E, Menefee S (2018) Ergonomics in surgery: a review. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 24(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000456 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Köckerling F (2014) Robotic vs. standard laparoscopic technique—What is better? Front Surg 1:15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2014.00015 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Bhama AR, Obias V, Welch KB et al (2016) A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Surg Endosc 30(4):1576–1584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4381-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guend H, Widmar M, Patel S et al (2017) Developing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program: understanding institutional and individual learning curves. Surg Endosc 31(7):2820–2828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5292-0 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources