Fragility Analysis of Statistically Significant Outcomes of Randomized Control Trials in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 32756285
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003645
Fragility Analysis of Statistically Significant Outcomes of Randomized Control Trials in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Study design: Systematic review.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the robustness of statistically significant outcomes from randomized control trials (RCTs) in spine surgery using Fragility Index (FI) which is a novel metric measuring the number of events upon which statistical significance of the outcome depends.
Summary of background data: Many trials in Spine surgery were characterized by fewer outcome events along with small sample size. FI helps us identify the robustness of the results from such studies with statistically significant dichotomous outcomes.
Methods: We conducted independent and in duplicate, a systematic review of published RCTs in spine surgery from PubMed Central, Embase, and Cochrane Database. RCTs with 1:1 prospective study design and reporting statistically significant dichotomous primary or secondary outcomes were included. FI was calculated for each RCT and its correlation with various factors was analyzed.
Results: Seventy trials met inclusion criteria with a median sample size of 133 (interquartile range [IQR]: 80-218) and median reported events per trial was 38 (IQR: 13-94). The median FI score was 2 (IQR: 0-5), which means if we switch two patients from nonevent to event, the statistical significance of the outcome is lost. The FI score was less than the number of patients lost to follow-up in 28 of 70 trials. The FI score was found to positively correlated with sample size (r = 0.431, P = 0.001), total number of outcome events (r = 0.305, P = 0.01) while negatively correlated with P value (r = -0.392, P = 0.001). Funding, journal impact-factor, risk of bias domains, and year of publication did not have a significant correlation.
Conclusion: Statistically significant dichotomous outcomes reported in spine surgery RCTs are more often fragile and outcomes of the patients lost to follow-up could have changed the significance of results and hence it needs caution before transcending their results into clinical application. The addition of FI in routine reporting of RCTs would guide readers on the robustness of the statistical significance of outcomes. RCTs with FI ≥5 without any patient lost to follow-up can be considered to have clinically robust results.Level of Evidence: 1.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
TO THE EDITOR.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Dec 15;45(24):E1707. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003729. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020. PMID: 33230086 No abstract available.
-
TO THE EDITOR.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Dec 15;45(24):E1707-E1708. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003730. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020. PMID: 33230087 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in spine surgery: a systematic survey.Spine J. 2015 Oct 1;15(10):2188-97. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 11. Spine J. 2015. PMID: 26072464
-
Fragility of Results in Ophthalmology Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.Ophthalmology. 2018 May;125(5):642-648. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.11.015. Epub 2017 Dec 11. Ophthalmology. 2018. PMID: 29241744
-
The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in head and neck surgery.Laryngoscope. 2018 Sep;128(9):2094-2100. doi: 10.1002/lary.27183. Epub 2018 Apr 23. Laryngoscope. 2018. PMID: 29683494 Review.
-
Fragility of randomized controlled trials on treatment of proximal humeral fracture.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Aug;31(8):1610-1616. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.141. Epub 2022 Mar 1. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022. PMID: 35240302
-
The fragility of statistical findings in the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty literature: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jul;33(7):1650-1658. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.12.005. Epub 2024 Jan 27. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024. PMID: 38281679
Cited by
-
Predictors of Increased Fragility Index Scores in Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: An Umbrella Review.World J Surg. 2023 May;47(5):1163-1173. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-06928-3. Epub 2023 Jan 31. World J Surg. 2023. PMID: 36719446
-
The statistical fragility of vertebroplasty outcomes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2025 Jan-Mar;16(1):26-33. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_13_25. Epub 2025 Apr 1. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2025. PMID: 40292175 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fragility Index and Fragility Quotient in Statistically Significant Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Breast Surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jun 20;12(6):e5916. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005916. eCollection 2024 Jun. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024. PMID: 38903137 Free PMC article.
-
The Statistical Fragility of Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Research: A Systematic Review.Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Aug 28;12(8):23259671241266329. doi: 10.1177/23259671241266329. eCollection 2024 Aug. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 39221044 Free PMC article.
-
Fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in comparing laparoscopic versus robotic abdominopelvic surgeries.Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4270-4278. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10063-4. Epub 2023 Apr 24. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37095233 Review.
References
-
- Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF. User's guide to the orthopaedic literature: how to use an article about a surgical therapy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A:916–926.
-
- Bhandari M, Montori VM, Schemitsch EH. The undue influence of significant p-values on the perceived importance of study results. Acta Orthop 2005; 76:291–295.
-
- van Oldenrijk J, van Berkel Y, Kerkhoffs GM, et al. Do authors report surgical expertise in open spine surgery related randomized controlled trials? A systematic review on quality of reporting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38:857–864.
-
- Bailey CS, Fisher CG, Dvorak MF. Type II error in the spine surgical literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29:1146–1149.
-
- Sathish M, Eswar R. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in spine surgery—how good are they in methodological quality? A systematic review. Global Spine J 2020; 2192568220906810.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous