Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;29(21-22):4180-4193.
doi: 10.1111/jocn.15447. Epub 2020 Aug 28.

Use of an audit with feedback implementation strategy to promote medication error reporting by nurses

Alison M Hutchinson  1   2 , Vanessa Brotto  1 , Anna Chapman  1   2 , Anne E Sales  3   4 , Mohammadreza Mohebbi  5 , Tracey K Bucknall  1   6
Affiliations
Free article

Use of an audit with feedback implementation strategy to promote medication error reporting by nurses

Alison M Hutchinson et al. J Clin Nurs. 2020 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To outline the development and effect of an audit with feedback implementation strategy that intended to increase the rate of voluntary medication error reporting by nurses.

Background: Medication errors are a serious global health issue. Audit with feedback is a widely used implementation strategy that has potential to modify nurses' reporting behaviour and improve medication error reporting rates.

Design: Quasi-experimental implementation study (fulfilling the TIDieR checklist) with two pairs of matched wards at a private hospital in Australia was conducted from March 2015-September 2016. One ward from each pair was randomised to either the intervention or control group.

Method: Nurses within intervention wards received audit with feedback on a quarterly basis over a 12-month implementation period. Control wards underwent quarterly audits only (without feedback). Feedback consisted of a one-page infographic poster, with content based on medication error data obtained from audits and the hospitals' risk management system (RiskMan). The primary outcome-rate of medication errors reported per month-was determined in both groups at pre-implementation, implementation and postimplementation phases. Differences between groups were compared using generalised linear mixed models with Poisson distribution and log link.

Results: A nonsignificant intervention effect was found for rate of medication errors reported per month. Interestingly, when combining data from both groups, a significant increasing time trend was observed for medication errors reported per month across pre-implementation and implementation phases (80% increase).

Conclusions: The audit with feedback strategy developed in the present study did not effectively influence the voluntary reporting of medication errors by nurses.

Relevance to clinical practice: Despite the lack of intervention effects, the use of a published checklist to optimise the reporting quality of this study will contribute to the field by furthering the understanding of how to enhance audit with feedback implementation strategies for nurses.

Keywords: feedback; health care; implementation science; medical audit; medication errors; nurses; patient safety; psychological; quality assurance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Aitken, M., and Gorokhovich, L. (2012). Advancing the Responsible Use of Medicines: Applying Levers for Change, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2222541
    1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl, & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior. Berlin, Heidelber, New York: Springer-Verlag.
    1. Armitage, G., & Knapman, H. (2003). Adverse events in drug administration: A literature review. Journal of Nursing Management, 11, 130-140.
    1. Bärnighausen, T., Tugwell, P., Røttingen, J.-A., Shemilt, I., Rockers, P., Geldsetzer, P., … Atun, R. (2017). Quasi-experimental study designs series-Paper 4: Uses and value. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 89, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.012
    1. Bauer, M. S., Damschroder, L., Hagedorn, H., Smith, J., & Kilbourne, A. M. (2015). An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychology, 3, 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9