Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):e19857.
doi: 10.2196/19857.

Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study

Affiliations

Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study

Samuel Altmann et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. .

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is the greatest public health crisis of the last 100 years. Countries have responded with various levels of lockdown to save lives and stop health systems from being overwhelmed. At the same time, lockdowns entail large socioeconomic costs. One exit strategy under consideration is a mobile phone app that traces the close contacts of those infected with COVID-19. Recent research has demonstrated the theoretical effectiveness of this solution in different disease settings. However, concerns have been raised about such apps because of the potential privacy implications. This could limit the acceptability of app-based contact tracing in the general population. As the effectiveness of this approach increases strongly with app uptake, it is crucial to understand public support for this intervention.

Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate the user acceptability of a contact-tracing app in five countries hit by the pandemic.

Methods: We conducted a largescale, multicountry study (N=5995) to measure public support for the digital contact tracing of COVID-19 infections. We ran anonymous online surveys in France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States. We measured intentions to use a contact-tracing app across different installation regimes (voluntary installation vs automatic installation by mobile phone providers) and studied how these intentions vary across individuals and countries.

Results: We found strong support for the app under both regimes, in all countries, across all subgroups of the population, and irrespective of regional-level COVID-19 mortality rates. We investigated the main factors that may hinder or facilitate uptake and found that concerns about cybersecurity and privacy, together with a lack of trust in the government, are the main barriers to adoption.

Conclusions: Epidemiological evidence shows that app-based contact tracing can suppress the spread of COVID-19 if a high enough proportion of the population uses the app and that it can still reduce the number of infections if uptake is moderate. Our findings show that the willingness to install the app is very high. The available evidence suggests that app-based contact tracing may be a viable approach to control the diffusion of COVID-19.

Keywords: COVID-19; app; contact tracing; digital; epidemiology; mHealth; proximity tracing; user acceptability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Likelihood of having the app installed, under opt-in and opt-out regimes and by country. Light/dark red bars correspond to probably/definitely won’t install in Panel A and probably/definitely uninstall in Panel B.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Determinants of stating definitely install or probably install. Note: the dependent variable is an indicator variable taking the value 1 if a respondent chose definitely install or probably install when asked whether they would install the app or not, and 0 otherwise. We use a Linear Probability Model. Lines represent 95% CIs calculated with heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors. All coefficients are the result of a single regression and thus display marginal effects. A coefficient of 0.1 implies a respondent who chose this option is 10 percentage points more likely to state they would definitely or probably install the app relative to the base category.

References

    1. Ferguson N, Laydon D, Nedjati Gilani G, Imai N, Ainslie K, Baguelin M, Bhatia S. Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand. Imperial College London. 2020:E. doi: 10.25561/77482. https://spiral.imperial.ac.uk:8443/handle/10044/1/77482 - DOI
    1. Cowling BJ, Ali ST, Ng TWY, Tsang TK, Li JCM, Fong MW, Liao Q, Kwan MY, Lee SL, Chiu SS, Wu JT, Wu P, Leung GM. Impact assessment of non-pharmaceutical interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 and influenza in Hong Kong: an observational study. The Lancet Public Health. 2020 May 17;5(5):e279–e288. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30090-6. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2468-2667(20)30090-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Economic outlook - 26 March 2020. INSEE. 2020. [2020-04-22]. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/4473305?sommaire=4473307.
    1. Barrot J, Grassi B, Sauvagnat J. Sectoral Effects of Social Distancing. SSRN Journal. 2020 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3569446. - DOI
    1. Bayham J, Fenichel EP. Impact of school closures for COVID-19 on the US health-care workforce and net mortality: a modelling study. The Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e271–e278. doi: 10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30082-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms