Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Safety and efficacy of hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose for all animal species

EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose as a feed additive for all animal species. Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose is intended for use as a technological additive (functional group: stabiliser) in premixtures and feedingstuffs for all animal species with no minimum and maximum content. A proper identification and characterisation of hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose as required for a feed additive is not available and the occurrence of potential toxic impurities cannot be assessed. The following conclusions apply only to hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose meeting the food additive specifications. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose is considered safe for all animal species. The use of hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose in animal nutrition is of no concern for consumer safety. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel was not in the position to conclude on the safety of hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose for the user. The use of hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose as a feed additive is considered safe for the environment. The additive is considered to be efficacious in feedingstuffs for all animal species.

Keywords: E 464; Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose; efficacy; safety; technological additive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A generalised structure of hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bergot F and Breque J, 1983. Digestibility of starch by rainbow trout: Effects of the physical state of starch and of the intake level. Aquaculture, 34, 203–212.
    1. Chiou PWS, Bi YuB and Lin C, 1998. The effect of different fibre components on growth rate, nutrient digestibility, rate of digesta passage and hindgut fermentation in domesticated rabbits. Laboratory Animals, 32, 276–283. - PubMed
    1. EFSA AFC Panel (EFSA Panel on food additives, flavourings, processing aids and materials in contact with food), Anton R, Barlow S, Boskou D, Castle L, Crebelli R, Dekant W, Engel K‐H, Forsythe S, Grunow W, Larsen J‐C, Leclercq C, Mennes W, Milana M‐R, Rietjens I, Svensson K, Tobback P and Toldrá F, 2004. Scientific Opinion on a request from the Commission related to Ethyl Cellulose as a food additive. EFSA Journal 2014;2(4):35, 6 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2004.35 - DOI
    1. EFSA ANS Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food), Younes M, Aggett P, Aguilar F, Crebelli R, Di Domenico A, Dusemund B, Filipič M, Jose Frutos M, Galtier P, Gott D, Gundert‐Remy U, Georg Kuhnle G, Lambre C, Leblanc J‐C, Lillegaard IT, Moldeus P, Mortensen A, Oskarsson A, Stankovic I, Tobback P, Waalkens‐Berendsen I, Wright M, Tard A, Tasiopoulou S and Woutersen RA, 2018. Scientific Opinion on the re‐evaluation of celluloses E 460(i), E 460(ii), E 461, E 462, E 463, E 464, E 465, E 466, E 468 and E 469 as food additives. EFSA Journal 2018;16(1):5047, 104 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5047 - DOI - PubMed
    1. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), 2012a. Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for technological additives. EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2528, 23 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2528 - DOI