Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul 15:10:308.
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00308. eCollection 2020.

Modern Tools for Rapid Diagnostics of Antimicrobial Resistance

Affiliations
Review

Modern Tools for Rapid Diagnostics of Antimicrobial Resistance

Antti Vasala et al. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. .

Abstract

Fast, robust, and affordable antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is required, as roughly 50% of antibiotic treatments are started with wrong antibiotics and without a proper diagnosis of the pathogen. Validated growth-based AST according to EUCAST or CLSI (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute) recommendations is currently suggested to guide the antimicrobial therapy. Any new AST should be validated against these standard methods. Many rapid diagnostic techniques can already provide pathogen identification. Some of them can additionally detect the presence of resistance genes or resistance proteins, but usually isolated pure cultures are needed for AST. We discuss the value of the technologies applying nucleic acid amplification, whole genome sequencing, and hybridization as well as immunodiagnostic and mass spectrometry-based methods and biosensor-based AST. Additionally, we evaluate the potential of integrated systems applying microfluidics to integrate cultivation, lysis, purification, and signal reading steps. We discuss technologies and commercial products with potential for Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) and their capability to analyze polymicrobial samples without pre-purification steps. The purpose of this critical review is to present the needs and drivers for AST development, to show the benefits and limitations of AST methods, to introduce promising new POCT-compatible technologies, and to discuss AST technologies that are likely to thrive in the future.

Keywords: antibiotic resistance; antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial susceptibility test; point of care test; rapid AST.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rapid AST or rapid result? (A) Current technologies. (B) Rapid AST applicable to pure cultures. (C) Rapid AST for clinical polymicrobial samples. The presented times are rough estimates and generalizations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Usability landscape of rapid AST technologies. NAAT, nucleic acid amplification technology; TPX, immunodetection based on two-photon excitation fluorometry; Multipath, immunodiagnostic method applying magnetic spheres for cell separation, fluorescent nanoparticles for labeling and non-microscopic imaging.

References

    1. Almeida C., Azevedo N. F., Iversen C., Fanning S., Keevil C. W., Vieira M. J. (2009). Development and application of a novel peptide nucleic acid probe for the specific detection of cronobacter genomospecies (Enterobacter sakazakii) in powdered infant formula. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 2925–2930. 10.1128/AEM.02470-08 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. ARUP (2020). Scientific Resource for Research, and Education: Educational Resources - Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing | University of Utah. Available online at: https://arup.utah.edu/education/fisher-rapidAST-2019.php/ (accessed May 2, 2020).
    1. Athamanolap P., Hsieh K., Chen L., Yang S., Wang T.-H. (2017). Integrated bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using pcr and high-resolution melt. Anal. Chem. 89, 11529–11536. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02809 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Avesar J., Rosenfeld D., Truman-Rosentsvit M., Ben-Arye T., Geffen Y., Bercovici M., et al. (2017). Rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing using nanoliter arrays. PNAS. 114, E5787–E5795. 10.1073/pnas.1703736114 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baeza L. L., Pfennigwerth N., Greissl C., Göttig S., Saleh A., Stelzer Y., et al. (2019). Comparison of five methods for detection of carbapenemases in enterobacterales with proposal of a new algorithm. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 25, 1286.e9–1286.e15. 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.03.003 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances