Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 11:2:100033.
doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100033. eCollection 2020.

Understanding the extent of contraceptive non-use among women at risk of unintended pregnancy, National Survey of Family Growth 2011-2017

Affiliations

Understanding the extent of contraceptive non-use among women at risk of unintended pregnancy, National Survey of Family Growth 2011-2017

Brittni N Frederiksen et al. Contracept X. .

Abstract

Objective: To describe characteristics of U.S. contraceptive non-users to inform tailored contraceptive access initiatives.

Study design: We used National Survey of Family Growth data from 2011 to 2017 to identify characteristics of contraceptive non-users compared to other women ages 15-44 at risk for unintended pregnancy. We also examined reasons for not using contraception by when non-users expected their next birth. We calculated unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios using two definitions of contraceptive non-use: (1) contraceptive non-use during the interview month, and (2) a more refined definition based on contraception use during the most recent month of sexual intercourse and expectation of timing of next birth. We considered p-values < 0.05 statistically significant.

Results: Approximately 20% (n = 2844) of 12,071 women at risk of unintended pregnancy were classified as standard contraceptive non-users. After adjusting for all other variables, non-users were more likely to be low-income, uninsured, never married, expect a birth within 2 years, and have zero or one parity. The top reasons for contraceptive non-use were not minding if they got pregnant (22.6%), worried about contraceptive side effects (21.0%), and not thinking they could get pregnant (17.6%). After applying the more refined non-user definition, we identified 5.7% (n = 721) of women as non-users; expecting a birth within 2-5 years and having a parity of one were associated with non-use after adjustment of all other factors.

Conclusion: Our more refined definition of non-users could be used in future studies examining the causes of unintended pregnancy and to inform programmatic interventions to reduce unintended pregnancy.

Implications: Describing contraceptive non-users and reasons for contraceptive non-use could help us better understand reasons for unintended pregnancy and inform tailored contraceptive access initiatives.

Keywords: Contraceptive access; Contraceptive non-use; National Survey of Family Growth; Unintended pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of female respondents ages 15–44 used to identify non-users of contraception, National Survey of Family Growth, 2011–2017. Gray shaded box represents initial non-users of contraception and black boxes with white text represent refined non-users of contraception. aEver had vaginal sex with a man, not currently pregnant or seeking pregnancy, not infecund for non-contraceptive reasons, and their partner not infecund for non-contraceptive reasons.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kost K., Zolna M. Challenging unintended pregnancy as an indicator of reproductive autonomy: a response. Contraception. 2019;100(1):5–9. - PubMed
    1. Aiken A.R., Borrero S., Callegari L.S., Dehlendorf C. Rethinking the pregnancy planning paradigm: unintended conceptions or unrepresentative concepts? Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016;48(3):147–151. - PMC - PubMed
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020 Objectives: Family Planning. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?top.... Accessed October 17, 2013.
    1. Potter J.E., Stevenson A.J., Coleman-Minahan K. Challenging unintended pregnancy as an indicator of reproductive autonomy. Contraception. 2019;100(1):1–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall J.A., Benton L., Copas A., Stephenson J. Pregnancy intention and pregnancy outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Maternal Child Health J. 2017;21(3):670–704. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources