Is coating of titanium implants effective at preventing Staphylococcus aureus infections? A meta-analysis of animal model studies
- PMID: 32761434
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-020-04660-4
Is coating of titanium implants effective at preventing Staphylococcus aureus infections? A meta-analysis of animal model studies
Abstract
Aim of the study: To assess the effects of the available coating methods against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) biofilm development on titanium implants.
Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases until May 18, 2019, for studies that used animal models of infections to evaluate various titanium implant coating methods to prevent S. aureus infection. Twenty-seven studies were eligible for inclusion in qualitative synthesis. Of those, twenty-three were considered in pair-wise meta-analysis. In addition, subgroup analysis of implant protection strategies relative to uncoated controls was performed, and any adverse events stemming from the coating applications were reported. Quality assessment was performed using SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies.
Results: Meta-analysis showed that active coating with antibiotics was favoured over uncoated controls (standardised mean differences [SMD] for MRSA and MSSA were - 2.71 [95% CI, - 4.24 to - 1.18], p = 0.0005, and - 2.5 [- 3.79 to - 1.22], p = 0.0001, respectively). Likewise, large effect sizes were demonstrated when a combination of active and conventional non-degradable passive coatings was compared with controls (SMDs for MRSA and MSSA were - 0.62 [95% CI, - 1.15 to - 0.08], p = 0.02, and - 1.93 [95% CI, - 2.87 to - 0.98], p < 0.001, respectively).
Discussion/conclusion: As a standalone prevention method, active titanium coating with antibiotics yielded promising results against both MSSA and MRSA. Combinations between active and non-degradable passive coatings, potentially allowing for sustained antimicrobial substance release, provided consistent hardware infection protection. Thus, we recommend that future research efforts focus on combined coating modalities against S. aureus biofilm infections in the presence of titanium implants.
Systematic review registration: CRD42019123462.
Keywords: Biofilm; Coating; Infection prevention; Prophylaxis; Staphylococcus; Titanium.
References
-
- Kurtz SM, Lau E, Schmier J, Ong KL, Zhao K, Parvizi J (2008) Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplast 23(7):984–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.017 - DOI
-
- Cats-Baril W, Gehrke T, Huff K, Kendoff D, Maltenfort M, Parvizi J (2013) International consensus on periprosthetic joint infection: description of the consensus process. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(12):4065–4075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3329-4 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Lenguerrand E, Whitehouse MR, Beswick AD, Toms AD, Porter ML, Blom AW (2017) Description of the rates, trends and surgical burden associated with revision for prosthetic joint infection following primary and revision knee replacements in England and Wales: an analysis of the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. BMJ Open 7(7):–e014056. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014056
-
- Bonnevialle P, Bonnomet F, Philippe R, Loubignac F, Rubens-Duval B, Talbi A, Le Gall C, Adam P (2012) Early surgical site infection in adult appendicular skeleton trauma surgery: a multicenter prospective series. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(6):684–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.08.002 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Berbari EF, Osmon DR, Lahr B, Eckel-Passow JE, Tsaras G, Hanssen AD, Mabry T, Steckelberg J, Thompson R (2012) The Mayo prosthetic joint infection risk score: implication for surgical site infection reporting and risk stratification. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 33(8):774–781. https://doi.org/10.1086/666641 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
