Genetically predicted circulating concentrations of micronutrients and risk of breast cancer: A Mendelian randomization study
- PMID: 32761610
- PMCID: PMC8268064
- DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33246
Genetically predicted circulating concentrations of micronutrients and risk of breast cancer: A Mendelian randomization study
Abstract
The epidemiological literature reports inconsistent associations between consumption or circulating concentrations of micronutrients and breast cancer risk. We investigated associations between genetically predicted concentrations of 11 micronutrients (beta-carotene, calcium, copper, folate, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, selenium, vitamin B6 , vitamin B12 and zinc) and breast cancer risk using Mendelian randomization (MR). A two-sample MR study was conducted using 122 977 women with breast cancer and 105 974 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. MR analyses were conducted using the inverse variance-weighted approach, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of potential violations of MR assumptions. A value of 1 SD (SD: 0.08 mmol/L) higher genetically predicted concentration of magnesium was associated with a 17% (odds ratio [OR]: 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-1.25, P value = 9.1 × 10-7 ) and 20% (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.08-1.34, P value = 3.2 × 10-6 ) higher risk of overall and ER+ve breast cancer, respectively. An inverse association was observed for a SD (0.5 mg/dL) higher genetically predicted phosphorus concentration and ER-ve breast cancer (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.98, P value = .03). There was little evidence that any other nutrient was associated with breast cancer. The results for magnesium were robust under all sensitivity analyses and survived correction for multiple comparisons. Higher circulating concentrations of magnesium and potentially phosphorus may affect breast cancer risk. Further work is required to replicate these findings and investigate underlying mechanisms.
Keywords: Mendelian randomization; breast cancer; causal inference; diet; nutrition.
© 2020 Union for International Cancer Control.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
-
- World Cancer Research Fund / American Institute for Cancer Research, Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Cancer: a Global Perspective. Continuous Update Project Expert Report, 2018.
-
- Schatzkin A, Kipnis V. Could exposure assessment problems give us wrong answers to nutrition and cancer questions? J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1564–5. - PubMed
-
- Ioannidis JP. Implausible results in human nutrition research. BMJ 2013;347:f6698. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- R01 CA059045/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- 19169/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- U01 CA137088/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U19 CA148065/NH/NIH HHS/United States
- C1287/A10118/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- X01HG007492/NH/NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA201407/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- C18281/A19169/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- U19 CA148065/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- 29019/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- C1287/A10710/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 001/WHO_/World Health Organization/International
- C1287/A16563/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
