Shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness: A concept analysis
- PMID: 32761783
- PMCID: PMC7590107
- DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12365
Shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness: A concept analysis
Abstract
Aim: Shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness has increasingly attracted attention. However, this concept has not been comprehensively clarified. This review aimed to clarify a concept of shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness such as schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder, and propose an adequate definition.
Methods: Rodgers' evolutionary concept analysis was used. MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and CINAHL were searched for articles written in English and published between 2010 and November 2019. The search terms were "psychiatr*" or "mental" or "schizophren*" or "depression" or "bipolar disorder", combined with "shared decision making". In total, 70 articles met the inclusion criteria. An inductive approach was used to identify themes and sub-themes related to shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness. Surrogate terms and a definition of the concept were also described.
Results: Four key attributes were identified: user-professional relationship, communication process, user-friendly visualization, and broader stakeholder approach. Communication process was the densest attribute, which consisted of five phases: goal sharing, information sharing, deliberation, mutual agreement, and follow-up. The antecedents as prominent predisposing factors were long-term complex illness, power imbalance, global trend, users' desire, concerns, and stigma. The consequences included decision-related outcomes, users' changes, professionals' changes, and enhanced relationship.
Conclusions: Shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness is a communication process, involving both user-friendly visualization techniques and broader stakeholders. The process may overcome traditional power imbalance and encourage changes among both users and professionals that could enhance the dyadic relationship.
Keywords: bipolar disorder; depression; review; schizophrenia; shared decision making.
© 2020 The Author. Japan Journal of Nursing Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Academy of Nursing Science.
Conflict of interest statement
Y.A. has received the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science‐in‐Aid for Scientific Research and lecture fees from MSD.
Figures
References
-
- * Alegria, M. , Nakash, O. , Johnson, K. , Ault‐Brutus, A. , Carson, N. , Fillbrunn, M. , … Shrout, P. E. (2018). USA effectiveness of the DECIDE interventions on shared decision making and perceived quality of care in behavioral health with multicultural patients: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 75(4), 325–335. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4585 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Amador, X. (2012). I am not sick, I don't need help! How to help someone with mental illness accept treatment. 10th anniversary Ed. New York, NY: Vida Press.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
