Use of medical face masks versus particulate respirators as a component of personal protective equipment for health care workers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
- PMID: 32762735
- PMCID: PMC7406874
- DOI: 10.1186/s13756-020-00779-6
Use of medical face masks versus particulate respirators as a component of personal protective equipment for health care workers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Use of medical face masks versus particulate respirators as a component of personal protective equipment for health care workers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Sep 9;9(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00810-w. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020. PMID: 32900385 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Currently available evidence supports that the predominant route of human-to-human transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 is through respiratory droplets and/or contact routes. The report by the World Health Organization (WHO) Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China supports person-to-person droplet and fomite transmission during close unprotected contact with the vast majority of the investigated infection clusters occurring within families, with a household secondary attack rate varying between 3 and 10%, a finding that is not consistent with airborne transmission. The reproduction number (R0) for the SARS-CoV-2 is estimated to be between 2.2-2.7, compatible with other respiratory viruses associated with a droplet/contact mode of transmission and very different than an airborne virus like measles with a R0 widely cited to be between 12 and 18. Based on the scientific evidence accumulated to date, our view is that SARS-CoV-2 is not spread by the airborne route to any significant extent and the use of particulate respirators offers no advantage over medical masks as a component of personal protective equipment for the routine care of patients with COVID-19 in the health care setting. Moreover, prolonged use of particulate respirators may result in unintended harms. In conjunction with appropriate hand hygiene, personal protective equipment (PPE) used by health care workers caring for patients with COVID-19 must be used with attention to detail and precision of execution to prevent lapses in adherence and active failures in the donning and doffing of the PPE.
Keywords: Airborne; COVID-19; Contact; Droplet; Infection prevention; Medical mask; N95 respirator; SARS-CoV-2; Transmission.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The members of the World Health Organization (WHO) COVID-19 Infection Prevention and Control Research and Innovation Advisory Group who participated in the development of this manuscript, provide independent advice to WHO in their capacity as individuals with expertise in infection prevention and control.
Comment in
-
Scientific evidence supports aerosol transmission of SARS-COV-2.Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Dec 18;9(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00868-6. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020. PMID: 33339522 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- World Health Organization . Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Infection prevention and control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.
-
- World Health Organization . Infection prevention and control of epidemic- and pandemic-prone acute respiratory infections in health care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014. - PubMed
-
- Roy CJ, Milton DK. Airborne transmission of communicable infection--the elusive pathway. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(17):1710–1712. - PubMed
-
- Brankston G, Gitterman L, Hirji Z, Lemieux C, Gardam M. Transmission of influenza a in human beings. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7(4):257–265. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
